Grid-Forming Converter Fault Control via Selective Switch Blocking

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Grid-forming converters, such as Smart Transformers, face challenges in handling faults due to their low overload capability, which can lead to premature intervention and loss of selectivity in grid-breakers, causing unintended power supply disruptions.

Innovation Solution

A method that detects faults and switches the converter to a fault operating mode, blocking semiconductor switches to protect the converter while maintaining grid-breaker selectivity by gradually increasing output voltage and potentially switching to a square-wave mode to manage high short circuit currents, thereby integrating with existing protection systems without changes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the converter blocks semiconductor switches rapidly to protect itself from high current, then converter protection is improved, but grid-breaker selectivity is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconverter protectionVSAvoidgrid-breaker selectivity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The converter detects fault conditions and blocks semiconductor switches in advance before the grid-breaker would naturally trip, preventing converter damage while allowing the grid-breaker selectivity to be maintained through controlled timing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The converter dynamically adjusts its response to fault conditions by implementing a staged blocking strategy that adapts to the severity and type of fault, balancing self-protection needs with grid-breaker selectivity requirements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If the converter interrupts short circuit current before the breaker, then converter safety is improved, but power supply to the distribution network is interrupted

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconverter safetyVSAvoidpower supply continuity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The converter implements selective blocking of only the affected phase or phases during fault conditions, maintaining power supply continuity for healthy phases while protecting itself from damage in the faulty phase

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The converter applies partial blocking action by selectively interrupting current in only the faulty phase rather than completely shutting down all phases, thus providing adequate protection while minimizing impact on overall power supply

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentEP3591820B1Method for controlling a grid-forming converter, computer program and grid-forming converter
Publication Date: 2021.09.01 UNIVERSITY OF KIEL
  • EP3591820B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP3591820B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4

AI summary

The invention relates to a method for controlling a grid-forming converter, the converter comprising semiconductor switches and a control unit which controls the semiconductor switches. The invention further relates to a computer program for computer controlled execution of such a method and a grid-forming converter which is arranged for executing such a method.