Power Grid Recovery Analytics for Weather Failure Resilience

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for assessing power grid resilience during severe weather events lack granular data at a large scale, leading to incomplete understanding of recovery services' performance across failure events of different intensities, and existing metrics fail to account for the varying impact on individual customers and communities.

Innovation Solution

Development of a dynamic resilience metric using granular and large-scale data analytics to measure the impact of severe weather events on power distribution grids, incorporating unsupervised learning to identify patterns in failure characteristics and recovery speed, and a randomization inference framework to examine the statistical dependence between customer vulnerability and power failures.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If granular and large-scale data analytics are implemented to assess power grid resilience, then measurement precision of resilience metrics is improved, but device complexity and data processing requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresilience metric measurement precisionVSAvoiddata analytics system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the power grid into distribution-level units and assesses resilience metrics at this granular level rather than treating the entire grid as a single system. This segmentation enables precise measurement of resilience characteristics for individual distribution areas while managing data complexity through hierarchical organization of failure data from multiple weather events.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces smart grid infrastructure and data collection systems as intermediaries between the physical power grid and the analytics platform. These intermediaries automatically capture failure data, customer impact information, and recovery metrics, reducing the complexity of direct measurement while improving measurement precision through standardized data collection protocols.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Adaptability or versatility

If dynamic resilience metrics incorporating customer vulnerability are developed, then the ability to identify and prioritize vulnerable communities is improved, but the complexity of the assessment framework increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecustomizer vulnerability assessment capabilityVSAvoidresilience assessment framework complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by incorporating customer vulnerability characteristics specific to each distribution area into the resilience metrics. Rather than using uniform assessment criteria across the entire grid, the system adapts metrics to reflect local community vulnerabilities, enabling targeted identification of at-risk populations while maintaining manageable complexity through localized rather than universal customization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary action by pre-defining customer vulnerability categories and resilience metric frameworks before analyzing failure data. This preliminary structuring of assessment criteria and vulnerability classifications reduces the complexity of real-time analysis while enabling versatile adaptation to different community characteristics through pre-established assessment protocols.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Productivity

If recovery prioritization policies are optimized using unsupervised learning, then productivity of recovery services is improved, but the complexity of the policy optimization system increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverecovery service productivityVSAvoidpolicy optimization system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback by using unsupervised learning to analyze recovery performance data from multiple weather events and automatically adjust recovery prioritization policies. The system continuously processes failure data, customer impact metrics, and recovery outcomes to refine prioritization algorithms, improving recovery productivity while managing complexity through automated iterative optimization rather than manual policy development.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies parameter changes by allowing recovery prioritization policies to dynamically adjust based on learned patterns from historical failure data. The unsupervised learning system modifies policy parameters such as restoration sequencing criteria and resource allocation rules based on analyzed performance metrics, enabling productivity improvement through adaptive parameter optimization while keeping the system architecture relatively simple.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20240006883A1Systems and methods for resilient recovery services from power failures
Publication Date: 2024.01.04 GEORGIA TECH RES CORP
  • US20240006883A1 patent drawing
  • US20240006883A1 patent drawing
  • US20240006883A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A data analytics for recovery, using granular and large-scale failure data from the distribution grid. A key characteristic of the data analytics is its generalizability. The data analysis applies to a large number (169) of failure events rather than one disruption. Further, a data driven recovery scaling law characterizes how recovery speed scales with respect to the severity of weather-induced failures from moderate to extreme. The data analysis also demonstrates the promise of mitigating fundamental limitations of typical recovery through smart grid infrastructure. The data analytics generalizes from one service region in New York to another in Massachusetts. As data used are commonly available to most distribution system operators, the analytics is potentially applicable across the US and parts of the world.