Grid State Prediction Using Neural Network and Analytical Optimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for predicting the state of power transmission grids, especially with increased distributed energy production and weather dependency, require high processing power and are inefficient, often resulting in delayed and costly solutions such as massive expansions of computing capacity.

Innovation Solution

Combining an artificial neural network with an analytical optimization method to speed up computation, allowing for timely predictions without the need for new hardware or complex software, using a central computer arrangement to process measurement data and control commands.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If distributed energy production and weather-dependent energy sources are integrated into the power transmission grid, then energy production diversity increases, but grid state prediction difficulty increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy production diversityVSAvoidgrid state prediction difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by generating multiple possible grid state scenarios in advance, each representing different weather conditions and energy production levels. These pre-calculated scenarios are stored and can be quickly selected based on actual weather forecasts, avoiding the need for complex real-time predictions when the grid state must be determined.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adapts to changing conditions by selecting from pre-calculated scenarios based on current weather forecasts and actual grid measurements. Rather than using a static prediction model, the system flexibly chooses the most appropriate scenario and adjusts control measures accordingly, handling the variability introduced by weather-dependent energy sources.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Measurement precision

If traditional analytical algorithms are used for grid state prediction, then prediction accuracy is maintained, but processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprediction accuracyVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs computationally intensive analytical calculations in advance, generating multiple grid state scenarios with different weather conditions and energy production levels. These pre-calculated scenarios store the results of complex DSPF computations, so when prediction is needed, the system simply selects from pre-computed results rather than performing new calculations, dramatically reducing processing time while maintaining accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates copies of the grid model and performs parallel calculations for multiple scenarios. Each scenario is a copy of the base grid model with different weather and production parameters, allowing simultaneous pre-computation of multiple possible states without sequential processing delays.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Productivity

If computing capacity is massively expanded to handle real-time predictions, then prediction speed increases, but cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprediction speedVSAvoidcomputing resources
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs computationally intensive calculations in advance during off-peak times when computing resources are more readily available and less costly. By pre-generating multiple grid state scenarios before they are needed, the system avoids the need for massive real-time computing capacity, achieving fast predictions using minimal processing power at the moment of need.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses periodic batch processing to pre-calculate scenarios at scheduled intervals rather than requiring continuous high-speed computation. This allows using standard computing resources periodically to generate scenarios that serve multiple prediction needs, reducing the overall computing resource requirements compared to continuous real-time processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Data Source

PatentUS20230018146A1Method and central computer arrangement for predicting a grid state, and computer program product
Publication Date: 2023.01.19 SIEMENS AG
  • US20230018146A1 patent drawing
  • US20230018146A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method predicts a grid state of an electrical power distribution grid, in which a central computer arrangement is used to receive measured values from measuring devices. A state estimation device is used to predict a future grid state, wherein the prediction of the future grid state is taken as a basis for ascertaining measures to guarantee stability of the power distribution grid. The prediction is made for multiple times within a predefined time window. A first prediction device is used to ascertain a prediction for a first portion of the multiple times on the basis of a voltage var control method, and in that a second prediction device is used to ascertain a prediction for a second portion of the multiple times on the basis of a neural network method.