Power Grid Topology Control for Uncertainty and Adversarial Attacks

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional power grid management systems struggle to handle uncertainties in power generation and load demand, particularly due to weather conditions, leading to potential transmission losses and blackouts, and are vulnerable to adversarial attacks, without effectively managing transient stability and combinatorial topological actions.

Innovation Solution

A reinforcement learning (RL) framework combined with heuristics for real-time power grid management, utilizing a Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) agent to predict remedial topologies and apply line reconnection/recovery actions, while selecting optimal heuristics based on predefined safety thresholds to maintain grid stability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If conventional deep-learning based approaches are used for remedial actions, then the system can handle fixed-topology networks, but it fails to explore combinatorial topological actions and adapt to complex scenarios

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to handle combinatorial topological actionsVSAvoidsystem complexity for handling complex scenarios
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the complex remedial action space into two distinct components: (1) topological actions (line disconnection/reconnection) and (2) generator re-dispatch actions. This segmentation allows the system to handle combinatorial topological actions separately from continuous re-dispatch decisions, enabling exploration of topology changes without being overwhelmed by the full complexity of simultaneous continuous control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transitions from fixed-topology approaches to dynamic topology optimization by introducing a reinforcement learning framework that can adaptively explore and exploit combinatorial topological actions. The system dynamically adjusts the network topology based on real-time conditions, moving beyond static deep-learning approaches to handle complex, evolving scenarios.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Adaptability or versatility

If simple RL-based frameworks are used for topological remedial actions, then the system can adapt to changing conditions, but it performs poorly in complex scenarios compared to more advanced methods

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to changing conditionsVSAvoidperformance reliability in complex scenarios
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges two previously separate approaches into a unified reinforcement learning framework: (1) topological remedial actions (line disconnection/reconnection) and (2) generator re-dispatch actions. This combination allows the system to simultaneously optimize both topology and generation, achieving superior performance in complex scenarios while maintaining adaptability to changing conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a universal reinforcement learning framework that handles multiple types of remedial actions through a single integrated system. The framework can perform topological changes, generator re-dispatch, and their combinations, making it universally applicable to various operational scenarios rather than requiring separate specialized systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Productivity

If dueling Deep Q-network with prioritized replay buffer is used, then the system can act in contingency situations, but it lacks robustness against adversarial attacks and temporal variations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse capability in contingency situationsVSAvoidrobustness against adversarial attacks and temporal variations
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent incorporates preliminary action by implementing a cooldown mechanism that prevents immediate repeated actions on the same component. This preliminary restriction on action frequency provides robustness against adversarial attacks that attempt to exploit rapid sequential actions, while still enabling effective response to contingency situations through strategic timing of remedial actions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Device complexity

If Graph Neural Network based actor-critic method is used to find goal topology, then the system can optimize network topology, but it fails to perform well in more complex scenarios

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetopology optimization capabilityVSAvoidperformance in complex scenarios
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transitions from static Graph Neural Network approaches to dynamic reinforcement learning optimization. The system dynamically explores topology configurations and generator re-dispatch combinations through sequential decision-making, adapting to complex scenarios that require temporal reasoning and strategic planning beyond static optimization capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS12476460B2Reinforcement learning and heuristic based real time power grid management
Publication Date: 2025.11.18 TATA CONSULTANCY SERVICES LTD
  • US12476460B2 patent drawing
  • US12476460B2 patent drawing
  • US12476460B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The challenge in managing power grid networks lies not only in dealing with the uncertainty of power demand and generation, or the uncertain events, but also with the huge action space even in a moderately-sized grid. In most such scenarios, the grid operator relies on his/her own experience or at best, some of the potential heuristics whose scope is limited to mitigating only a certain type of uncertainties. The present disclosure provides a heuristic-guided RL framework, for robust control of power networks subjected to production and demand uncertainty, as well as adversarial attacks. Using a careful action selection process, in combination with line reconnection and recovery heuristics, equips the present disclosure to outperform conventional approaches on several challenge datasets even with reduced action space. The present disclosure not only diversifies its actions across substations, but also learns to identify important action sequences to protect the network against targeted adversarial attacks.