Grid Transport Vehicle Access Control for Smaller Blocking Zones

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current transport systems with grid-patterned travel paths face inefficiencies due to large blocking zones during article transfers, which hinder the entry of other vehicles and reduce overall transport efficiency.

Innovation Solution

The transport system incorporates a controller that optimizes the access direction of transport vehicles to minimize the blocking zone area by determining the access direction that minimizes the number of occupied grid cells, allowing vehicles to transfer articles efficiently without interfering with others, using a grid-patterned rail system with a travel unit and transfer section that moves horizontally to placement tables.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If the transport vehicle occupies multiple grid spaces during article transfer, then the transfer operation can be completed, but the blocking zone area increases and interferes with other vehicles

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvearticle transfer capabilityVSAvoidblocking zone area
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by making the blocking zone configurable and adaptable based on the access direction. The system dynamically adjusts the blocking zone size and shape depending on whether the vehicle approaches from the first direction (smaller blocking zone) or second direction (larger blocking zone), allowing the static blocking zone concept to become dynamic and context-dependent.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameter of blocking zone area based on the access direction parameter. By selecting different access directions (first direction with smaller blocking zone vs. second direction with larger blocking zone), the system optimizes the blocking zone parameter to minimize interference with other vehicles while maintaining transfer capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If the blocking zone area is minimized, then other vehicles can enter more easily, but the access direction options are limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransport efficiencyVSAvoidaccess direction flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies asymmetry by creating different blocking zone configurations for different access directions. The first access direction corresponds to a smaller, more asymmetric blocking zone configuration, while the second direction corresponds to a larger configuration. This asymmetric approach allows the system to optimize for minimal blocking when using the preferred first direction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically selects access directions based on real-time conditions. The controller determines whether to use the first direction (with smaller blocking zone) or second direction (with larger blocking zone) based on the current situation, making the access direction flexible and adaptive rather than fixed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Device complexity

If the transport vehicle follows a fixed travel path, then the system is simple to control, but the ability to minimize blocking zone dynamically is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol system complexityVSAvoidtransport efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback by having the controller continuously monitor the situation and determine the optimal access direction based on current conditions. The controller receives information about vehicle positions and blocking zones, processes this information, and adjusts the access direction selection accordingly, creating a closed-loop control system that optimizes transport efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary calculation of blocking zone areas for different access directions before the vehicle actually approaches the placement table. By pre-determining which direction will result in the smaller blocking zone, the controller can plan the optimal path in advance, reducing real-time computational complexity while maintaining high transport efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS12119250B2Transport system and grid system
Publication Date: 2024.10.15 MURATA MASCH LTD
  • US12119250B2 patent drawing
  • US12119250B2 patent drawing
  • US12119250B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A transport system includes a plurality of transport vehicles and a controller. The transport vehicle includes a travel unit and transfer unit. The controller performs a blocking control to prohibit transport vehicles other than the transport vehicle from entering a blocking zone corresponding to the area occupied by the transport vehicle when transferring an article in a plan view. To transfer an article from/to a placement table, the transport vehicle travels along the route to the placement table in a first direction. An area of the blocking zone when the transport vehicle accesses to the placement table in the first direction is equal to or less than an area of the blocking zone identified when the transport vehicle accesses to the placement table in the second direction different from the first direction.