Grill Cooking Profile Merging for Multi-Food Timing Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Cooking multiple food items on a single grill device is challenging due to differing temperature and time requirements, often resulting in some items being undercooked or overcooked, as existing grill technologies rely on manual controls and lack efficient multi-item cooking profiles.

Innovation Solution

A grill device with a controller that allows users to input and combine multiple cooking profiles, enabling the formation of a hybrid cooking profile to manage temperature and time for multiple food items simultaneously, ensuring they finish cooking at the same time.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If multiple food items with different temperature and time requirements are cooked simultaneously on a single grill using manual controls, then the grill can prepare a complete meal, but some items will be undercooked or overcooked due to inability to manage different cooking profiles

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemeal preparation efficiencyVSAvoidcooking temperature and time control precision
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The cooking process is segmented into multiple independent cooking profiles, each tailored to specific food items with their own temperature and time requirements. The controller divides the cooking task into manageable segments that can be executed simultaneously with precise control, allowing different food items to be cooked according to their individual needs rather than forcing a single temperature setting for all items.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The grill controller is designed with multi-functionality to manage multiple cooking profiles simultaneously. It can receive, store, and execute several different cooking profiles (e.g., high heat for steaks, low heat for vegetables) at the same time, making a single grill device capable of handling diverse cooking requirements that would traditionally require multiple separate cooking processes or devices.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Ease of operation

If a single temperature setting is used for all food items on the grill, then the grill operation is simple, but food items with different cooking requirements cannot be properly cooked

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegrill control simplicityVSAvoidaccommodation of different food item requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

Cooking profiles are pre-programmed with specific temperature and time parameters for different food items. Users can select from predetermined profiles (e.g., 'steak profile,' 'vegetable profile') or customize their own, which eliminates the need for manual temperature adjustments during cooking. The controller automatically executes the selected profile, maintaining simplicity in operation while achieving precise control adapted to specific food requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The grill controller dynamically adjusts temperature settings based on the selected cooking profile and real-time cooking progress. It can automatically modify heating elements to maintain different temperature zones or change temperatures at specific time intervals, providing adaptability to different food items while keeping the user interface simple through automated control rather than requiring manual intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Manufacturing precision

If manual controls are used to adjust temperature for each food item, then individual cooking requirements can be met, but user effort and complexity increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveindividual food item cooking controlVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The cooking system performs self-service by automatically executing pre-programmed cooking profiles without requiring continuous user intervention. Once a profile is selected, the controller autonomously manages temperature adjustments, timing, and monitoring, eliminating the need for users to manually adjust controls throughout the cooking process. This maintains precise control for individual food items while significantly reducing user effort and perceived complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The controller incorporates feedback mechanisms that continuously monitor cooking progress and automatically adjust temperature and timing based on sensor data. This closed-loop control system ensures precise cooking for each food item by responding to real-time conditions, while the automation of these adjustments reduces the complexity burden on the user, as the system self-regulates rather than requiring manual monitoring and adjustment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Manufacturing precision

If multiple cooking sessions are run sequentially for different food items, then each item receives proper attention, but total cooking time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecooking quality for each itemVSAvoidtotal meal preparation time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The controller merges multiple cooking sessions into a single coordinated operation by executing multiple cooking profiles simultaneously. It combines the timing and temperature control of different food items into one unified process, allowing steaks, vegetables, and other items to cook at the same time according to their respective profiles. This parallel processing approach maintains precise cooking quality for each item while dramatically reducing the total time required compared to sequential cooking.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The system ensures continuous useful action by keeping the grill operational at optimal temperatures throughout the entire cooking process. Rather than heating up and down between sequential cooking sessions, the controller maintains continuous heating at appropriate levels for multiple items simultaneously, eliminating idle time and ensuring that each food item receives consistent, uninterrupted cooking attention, thereby reducing total preparation time while maintaining quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Data Source

PatentUS20240315289A1Method of cooking multiple different food items on a grill device and related systems methods
Publication Date: 2024.09.26 TRAEGER PELLET GRILLS LLC
  • US20240315289A1 patent drawing
  • US20240315289A1 patent drawing
  • US20240315289A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The method may include retrieving a first cooking profile associated with the first food item, wherein the first cooking profile comprises at least one first temperature set point and at least one first time period. The method may also include controlling a temperature of the grill to the first cooking profile. The method may further include retrieving a second cooking profile associated with a second food item, wherein the second cooking profile comprises at least one second temperature set point and at least one second time period. The method may also include combining the first cooking profile and the second cooking profile to form a hybrid cooking profile comprising at least one third temperature set point and at least one third time period. The method may further include controlling the grill to the hybrid cooking profile after beginning the second cooking session.