Grinder Friction Drive Arbor Torque Limiting Mechanism

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Grinders with friction drives often suffer damage due to sudden stops of the motor or grinding wheel, causing stress on the drive train components, and the grinding wheel may loosen as a result of inertia and sudden deceleration.

Innovation Solution

A grinder design featuring an arbor with a slip-fit gear and an interference-fit collar, supported by springs that exert a biasing force to allow rotation with the gear below a threshold torque, preventing damage by enabling slippage when torque exceeds a certain level, thereby decoupling the arbor from the gear.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the grinding wheel is constrained to rotate with the motor rotor, then the grinding wheel rotates whenever the motor rotates, but sudden stops of the motor or grinding wheel cause damage to drive train components

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomponent safetyVSAvoiddrive train component strength
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

A friction drive interface is introduced as an intermediary between the motor rotor and the grinding wheel arbor. This interface includes a drive member on the rotor and a driven member on the arbor with a friction surface. The friction connection allows torque transmission during normal operation but permits slippage when excessive torque occurs, preventing damage to drive train components while maintaining reliable grinding wheel rotation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The friction drive system changes the torque transmission parameter dynamically. During normal operation, sufficient friction force transmits torque from the motor to the grinding wheel. When sudden stops or excessive loads occur, the friction interface allows relative motion (slippage), effectively changing the torque transmission state to protect components from damage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If the grinding wheel rotates at significant speed with significant mass, then grinding performance is improved, but inertia resists sudden stops and causes damage to drive train components

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegrinding performanceVSAvoiddrive train component strength
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The friction drive interface acts as a protective intermediary that decouples the high-inertia grinding wheel from the motor rotor during sudden stops. When the motor or wheel encounters a sudden stop, the friction interface allows controlled slippage, preventing the inertia of the heavy, high-speed grinding wheel from transmitting damaging forces to the drive train components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The friction drive system provides beforehand cushioning by designing the friction interface to absorb and dissipate the energy from sudden stops. The frictional slippage acts as a cushion that prevents the full impact of inertial forces from reaching the drive train components, protecting them from damage before the stop is complete.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

3Speed

If sudden stop occurs during operation, then motor or grinding wheel stops, but this tends to loosen the grinding wheel from the grinder

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemotor speedVSAvoidgrinding wheel stability
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The friction drive interface serves as a mediator that allows controlled relative motion between the motor rotor and grinding wheel arbor during sudden stops. This controlled slippage prevents the abrupt deceleration forces from loosening the grinding wheel mounting, maintaining the stability of the grinding wheel-grinder connection while still allowing the motor to stop.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design prevents damage to the drive train and grinding wheel by allowing controlled deceleration and reducing the likelihood of the grinding wheel loosening, ensuring component safety and operational stability.

Implementation Method 1

at least one spring disposed between the gear and the collar. The at least one spring may be configured to exert a biasing force along the first axis such that one or more resulting friction forces cause the arbor to rotate with the gear when a torque exerted on the gear is less than a threshold torque

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Implementation Method 2

a collar surrounding a second portion of the arbor and having an interference fit with the second portion of the arbor such that the collar is constrained for rotation with the arbor about the first axis

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Data Source

PatentUS9289878B2Grinders with friction drives
Publication Date: 2016.03.22 INGERSOLL RAND IND US INC
  • US9289878B2 patent drawing
  • US9289878B2 patent drawing
  • US9289878B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In one illustrative embodiment, a grinder may comprise an arbor configured to rotate about a first axis and to support a grinding wheel for rotation therewith, a gear surrounding a first portion of the arbor and having a slip fit with the first portion of arbor, a motor configured to drive rotation of a drive train including the gear, a collar surrounding a second portion of the arbor and having an interference fit with the second portion of the arbor such that the collar is constrained for rotation with the arbor about the first axis, and at least one spring disposed between the gear and the collar and configured to exert a biasing force along the first axis such that one or more resulting friction forces cause the arbor to rotate with the gear when a torque exerted on the gear is less than a threshold torque.