Grinding Device with Multi-Axis Trajectory for Solid Comminution

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing grinding devices lack the ability to efficiently adjust the intensity of grinding for solids with varying sizes or wide size distributions, and they often require bearings that come into contact with the solids or ground material.

Innovation Solution

A device with a container that is driven along a trajectory curve generated by superimposing movements along at least two axes at different frequencies and/or with phase offset, containing at least one loosely contained grinding body to comminute solids.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a ball mill with an inclined vertical axis is used, then grinding can be performed, but the device cannot be rotated and has limited adaptability for different solid sizes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability for different solid sizesVSAvoiddevice structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The container is driven along a trajectory curve generated by superimposing reciprocating movements along at least two axes at different frequencies, transforming the static grinding configuration into a dynamic one that can adapt to different solid sizes and shapes, resolving the contradiction between adaptability and structural simplicity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The reciprocating movements along multiple axes create periodic trajectory curves that generate varying grinding intensities and patterns, enabling the device to handle solids with different size distributions without requiring complex structural modifications

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

2Adaptability or versatility

If a cylindrical container with vertical axis is moved on a circular path by eccentric drive, then grinding can be performed, but the device cannot adjust grinding intensity for different materials

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadjustability of grinding intensityVSAvoidoperational simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The container follows a dynamically generated trajectory curve through superimposed reciprocating movements, allowing real-time adjustment of grinding intensity by modifying the frequency and phase relationships between axes, providing both adaptability and operational simplicity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

By changing the frequency ratios and phase offsets of the reciprocating movements along different axes, the grinding intensity can be adjusted for different materials and solid sizes without mechanical reconfiguration, maintaining ease of operation while enhancing adaptability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If bearings are used in the grinding device, then mechanical support is provided, but the bearings come into contact with solids or ground material causing contamination

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemechanical support stabilityVSAvoidcontamination of ground material
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The grinding device eliminates bearings that would contact the solids or ground material, extracting the problematic component from the system while maintaining mechanical support through the trajectory curve mechanism that moves the container without requiring internal bearings, thus preventing contamination

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The trajectory curve mechanism acts as an intermediary that provides the necessary mechanical support and motion without direct contact between supporting components and the ground material, allowing reliable operation while preventing contamination of the product

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Device complexity

If grinding bodies are loosely contained in the container, then the container can be driven along trajectory curves, but the grinding bodies may move uncontrollably

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontainer drive mechanism simplicityVSAvoidgrinding body position stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The loosely contained grinding bodies are stabilized through the controlled dynamic motion of the container along trajectory curves, where the reciprocating movements create consistent grinding patterns that prevent uncontrolled motion while maintaining operational simplicity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The periodic reciprocating movements along multiple axes create predictable gravitational and inertial patterns that keep the grinding bodies in controlled positions during the grinding cycle, preventing uncontrolled movement while preserving the simplicity of the container drive mechanism

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The device effectively comminutes solids by accelerating the grinding body and solids relative to the container, allowing for adjustable grinding intensity and continuous adaptation to the material, without the need for bearings that contact the solids.

Implementation Method 1

The trajectory curve accelerates the at least one grinding body, which can move freely in the container, relative to the container

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAcceleration:

Implementation Method 2

solids contained in the container are comminuted by the acceleration against the container wall

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectImpact force: Impact Force

Implementation Method 3

the reciprocating movement of the container drives the grinding body to move against the inner wall of the container

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Data Source

PatentUS20250170579A1Device and method for grinding
Publication Date: 2025.05.29 HS TUMBLER GMBH
  • US20250170579A1 patent drawing
  • US20250170579A1 patent drawing
  • US20250170579A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Device for comminuting solids, comprising a container which is driven to reciprocate along a trajectory curve which can be generated by superimposing the movement along at least two axes, which are at an angle to each other, at different frequencies and/or different speeds along each of the axes, with at least one grinding body loosely contained in the container.