Grinding Device Automatic Parameter Adjustment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing grinding devices require inconvenient and infrequent adjustments of grinding parameters to accommodate varying workpiece surface structures, leading to suboptimal grinding results and increased waste due to inability to adapt automatically to deviations from target surface finishes.

Innovation Solution

A method involving data collection and processing to compare actual surface data with target data, allowing for automatic adjustment of grinding parameters such as speed, pressure, and entry point to achieve desired surface finishes, with real-time monitoring and potential additional grinding media to correct deviations and determine optimal exchange times for grinding media.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If grinding parameters are adjusted individually for different workpiece surface structures, then grinding quality is improved, but device complexity and operation time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegrinding qualityVSAvoidparameter adjustment complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses optical sensors to detect the actual surface structure of workpieces in real-time and feeds this information back to the control unit, which automatically adjusts grinding parameters based on the detected characteristics, eliminating the need for manual parameter adjustment for different workpiece types

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The grinding device performs self-adjustment by automatically detecting workpiece surface characteristics and modifying its own operating parameters through the control unit, making the system self-adaptive without requiring external intervention or complex manual configuration

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Ease of operation

If grinding parameters are fixed for specific workpiece types, then operation simplicity is improved, but adaptability to different surface structures deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperation simplicityVSAvoidadaptability to surface structures
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system transitions from static fixed parameters to dynamic adjustable parameters by incorporating sensors and automatic control that enable real-time modification of grinding parameters based on detected workpiece characteristics, maintaining operational simplicity while achieving adaptability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The control unit automatically modifies grinding parameters such as speed, pressure, and medium selection based on detected surface structures, allowing the system to adapt to different workpiece types without requiring complex manual reconfiguration or sacrificing operational simplicity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Manufacturing precision

If manual monitoring and adjustment of grinding results is performed, then manufacturing precision is improved, but productivity decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegrinding result accuracyVSAvoidproduction efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

Optical sensors continuously monitor the grinding process and surface quality in real-time, providing immediate feedback to the control unit which automatically adjusts parameters to maintain target quality standards, eliminating the need for manual inspection while preserving precision

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces manual visual inspection and adjustment with automated optical detection and electronic control, substituting human operators with sensor-based monitoring that maintains quality precision while significantly increasing production speed and efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS11679471B2Method for operating a grinding device
Publication Date: 2023.06.20 KARL HEESEMANN MASCHFAB
  • US11679471B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A grinding device is operated by grinding of a surface of the workpiece with at least one grinding medium while recording actual data of the surface after grinding with at least one data collection device. Actual data recorded during grinding is then compared with target data stored in an electronic memory in an electronic data processing device. Based on the comparison, adjustments are made to at least one grinding parameter if a deviation of the actual data from the target data exceeds a predetermined limit.