Grinding Machine Layout for Parallel Tool and Workpiece Changes

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Grinding machines face challenges in achieving high throughput due to the time-consuming process of producing complex surface geometries, which affects cost-effectiveness and efficiency.

Innovation Solution

A grinding machine design with kinematically separated tool and workpiece spindles, allowing simultaneous movement for tool and workpiece changes, combined with a tool changer and advanced motor control, enables faster and more precise positioning and tool changes, increasing workpiece throughput.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If traditional grinding machines are used with integrated spindles, then the structure is simpler, but the throughput is limited due to sequential tool and workpiece changes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveworkpiece throughputVSAvoidspindle system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The spindle system is segmented into two completely independent spindles: a workpiece spindle for holding and positioning workpieces, and a tool spindle for holding and positioning grinding tools. This segmentation allows both spindles to operate independently and change tools/workpieces simultaneously, eliminating the sequential operation bottleneck of traditional single-spindle designs and thereby increasing workpiece throughput.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A robot arm is introduced as an intermediary device to automatically change tools on the tool spindle and workpieces on the workpiece spindle. The robot arm operates independently from the spindles, enabling automated tool/workpiece changes without interfering with the grinding operation, thus improving productivity while maintaining spindle independence.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If tool and workpiece changes are performed sequentially, then the positioning system is simpler, but the machining time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemachining speedVSAvoidtool change time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The tool spindle and workpiece spindle are positioned in advance at optimal locations before tool or workpiece changes are needed. The independent positioning systems prepare both spindles simultaneously, so that when a tool or workpiece change is required, both can be exchanged at the same time without waiting for sequential operations, reducing tool change time and increasing machining speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

While one tool or workpiece is being changed, the other spindle continues its grinding operation without interruption. The independent spindles enable continuous useful action by allowing tool/workpiece changes to occur simultaneously rather than requiring one spindle to stop and wait for the other, thereby minimizing idle time and maintaining continuous productive operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

3Measurement precision

If three linear axes are built onto one another for positioning, then the structure is more compact, but the positioning precision deteriorates due to accumulated errors

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepositioning precisionVSAvoidaxis arrangement complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The positioning system is divided into two independent spindle systems, each with its own dedicated positioning mechanisms. The workpiece spindle handles workpiece positioning while the tool spindle handles tool positioning, eliminating the need for nested linear axes. This segmentation prevents error accumulation that would occur in stacked axis configurations and maintains high positioning precision without requiring complex nested structures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Productivity

If the tool changer reaches into the work area from outside, then the tool change process is simpler, but the workpiece throughput decreases due to longer tool change time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveworkpiece throughputVSAvoidtool change operation
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

A robot arm serves as an intermediary device that performs tool changes automatically within the machine's work area. The robot arm picks up tools from a tool magazine and installs them on the tool spindle without requiring external manual intervention or reaching into the work area from outside the machine. This automated process reduces tool change time and increases workpiece throughput while maintaining ease of operation through automation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS20230373054A1Grinding machine and method of operating a grinding machine
Publication Date: 2023.11.23 ADELBERT HAAS GMBH
  • US20230373054A1 patent drawing
  • US20230373054A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A grinding machine includes a machine bed on which a workpiece spindle with a workpiece holder and a tool spindle with a tool holder are arranged. A workpiece held in the workpiece spindle, relative to a tool held in the tool holder, is displaceable along an X-axis running in a first direction parallel to the surface of the machine bed, is displaceable along a Y-axis, running in a second direction parallel to the surface of the machine bed, is displaceable along a Z-axis running perpendicular to the surface of the machine bed, is rotatable about an A-axis running parallel to the surface of the machine bed, and is rotatable about a C-axis running perpendicular to the surface of the machine bed. The tool spindle is completely kinematically separated from the workpiece spindle. Movements along the X-axis, about the A-axis and about the C-axis being carried out by the workpiece spindle.