Particulate Grinding Medium for Microfibrillated Cellulose

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for producing microfibrillated cellulose on an industrial scale are economically inefficient and lack improvements in properties, necessitating the development of new processes and materials to enhance production and properties.

Innovation Solution

A method involving the use of a particulate grinding medium with a specific gravity of at least 3.5 and surface roughness or coefficient of friction of at least 0.5 μm or 0.10, respectively, for microfibrillating cellulose, which facilitates the production of microfibrils through intimate interaction with cellulose fibers during grinding, allowing for reduced energy input and improved properties.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Use of energy by moving object

If conventional grinding media are used for microfibrillating cellulose, then the grinding process can be performed, but energy input is high and production is economically inefficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy inputVSAvoidproduction efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the physical parameters of the grinding medium by selecting materials with specific gravity ≥3.5 and controlled surface roughness (≥0.5 μm) or coefficient of friction (≥0.10). This parameter optimization enables efficient energy transfer during grinding while reducing the energy input required per unit of microfibrillated cellulose produced, directly resolving the contradiction between energy consumption and production efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs composite grinding media made from ceramic materials (such as zirconia, alumina) or metal alloys with specific property combinations. These composite materials provide both the high specific gravity needed for effective grinding action and the appropriate surface characteristics for efficient cellulose fibrillation, achieving high productivity without excessive energy input

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Reliability

If conventional grinding media are used, then grinding can proceed, but the media require frequent replenishment, increasing operational costs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegrinding media durabilityVSAvoidoperational cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent specifies minimum values for specific gravity (≥3.5) and surface properties (roughness ≥0.5 μm or friction coefficient ≥0.10) to ensure the grinding media maintain their functional characteristics throughout extended use. This parameter control enhances durability and reduces the frequency of replenishment, lowering operational costs while maintaining reliable grinding performance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates grinding media with optimized surface characteristics that replicate the ideal interaction with cellulose fibers. By copying the desired surface properties through controlled manufacturing (sintering processes for ceramics), the media achieve prolonged service life without requiring frequent replacement, resolving the contradiction between reliability and operational cost

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Manufacturing precision

If standard grinding processes are used, then microfibrillated cellulose can be produced, but product properties such as burst strength are not optimized

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduct qualityVSAvoidprocess complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent optimizes the grinding process by controlling parameters including grinding medium specific gravity (≥3.5), surface roughness (≥0.5 μm), or coefficient of friction (≥0.10), along with grinding time and energy input. These parameter adjustments produce microfibrillated cellulose with enhanced properties such as improved burst strength in paper products, achieving high manufacturing precision without significantly increasing process complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies preliminary action by pre-selecting grinding media with specific surface characteristics (roughness or friction coefficient) before the grinding process begins. This preliminary optimization of the grinding medium properties ensures that the subsequent grinding operation directly produces microfibrillated cellulose with the desired high-quality properties, avoiding the need for complex post-processing steps

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The method reduces energy input and enhances the properties of microfibrillated cellulose, such as burst strength in paper products, while eliminating the need for frequent replenishment of grinding media, thereby improving economic efficiency and product quality.

Implementation Method 1

a mean coefficient of friction of at least about 0.10

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Implementation Method 2

surface roughness of at least about 0.5 μm

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAbrasion: Abrasion

Implementation Method 3

by grinding in the presence of a particulate grinding medium

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectImpact force: Impact Force

Data Source

PatentUS11572658B2Grinding method and grinding medium
Publication Date: 2023.02.07 FIBERLEAN TECH LTD
  • US11572658B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for manufacturing microfibrillated cellulose, a particulate grinding medium suitable for use in said method, a material which wears rough, and a method for making said particulate grinding medium.