Grinding System for Aerospace Components with Constant Surface Footage

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional turning methods are inefficient for processing aerospace components, particularly with hardened or temperature-resistant materials, due to long processing times, tool life issues, and surface quality concerns such as machining burrs and residual stress.

Innovation Solution

A grinding system and method that involves rotating a workpiece relative to a first axis and controlling a grinding tool rotated relative to a second axis to maintain a constant surface footage, utilizing multiple grinding tools for roughing and finishing, including dressing tools to true the grinding tool surface, enabling faster material removal and improved surface finish.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If turning is used to finish aerospace components, then the processing can be completed, but the processing time is excessively long

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial removal rateVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the fundamental machining parameters by switching from turning to grinding, and specifically employs creep feed grinding with controlled feed rates and wheel speeds to achieve high material removal rates while maintaining surface quality

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the conventional turning mechanical system with a grinding system that uses abrasive wheels, and further substitutes traditional intermittent grinding with continuous creep feed grinding to eliminate idle time and maintain constant material removal

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Ease of manufacture

If turning is used on hardened or temperature resistant materials, then the material can be processed, but tool life is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessability of hardened materialsVSAvoidtool life
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSDuration of action of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the machining process from turning to grinding, which uses abrasive removal instead of cutting, enabling effective processing of hardened and temperature-resistant materials while extending tool life through controlled grinding parameters

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses a dressing tool to continuously replicate and restore the grinding wheel surface, creating a fresh cutting edge that maintains effectiveness and extends the life of the grinding tool when processing difficult materials

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Shape

If turning is used to finish components, then the shape can be achieved, but surface quality deteriorates with burrs and residual stress

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomponent geometryVSAvoidsurface quality
Core Design Contradiction:
ShapeVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the turning cutting mechanism with a grinding abrasion mechanism that removes material through controlled friction and abrasion, eliminating the plastic deformation that causes burrs and residual stress while achieving superior surface finish

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The grinding process inherently produces better surface quality through the nature of abrasive removal, and the system self-regulates surface finish through the interaction between wheel grain structure, speed, and feed rate without requiring additional finishing operations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Productivity

If conventional grinding is used, then material can be removed, but the surface footage varies leading to inconsistent surface finish

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial removal rateVSAvoidsurface finish consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs feedback control through the dresser that continuously monitors and adjusts the grinding wheel surface, and through controlled feed mechanisms that maintain constant surface footage by regulating the relative motion between wheel and workpiece

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses dynamic control of the grinding process where the feed rate and wheel speed are continuously adjusted during operation to maintain constant surface footage, transforming a static process into a dynamically controlled one that ensures consistent surface finish

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The grinding system significantly reduces processing time, enhances tool life, and improves surface quality by allowing for faster material removal and consistent surface finish, making it more effective than traditional turning methods for aerospace components.

Implementation Method 1

a first grinding tool rotated relative to a second axis that is perpendicular to the first axis and perpendicular to the workpiece central axis and grinding the workpiece with the first grinding tool

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAbrasion: Abrasion

Data Source

PatentUS9498865B2System and methods for rough grinding
Publication Date: 2016.11.22 RTX CORP
  • US9498865B2 patent drawing
  • US9498865B2 patent drawing
  • US9498865B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and methods are provided for grinding a workpiece. In one embodiment, a method includes controlling rotation of a workpiece, wherein the workpiece is rotated relative to a first axis, and controlling grinding of the workpiece by a first grinding tool to shape the workpiece, wherein the first grinding tool is rotated relative to a second axis. The method may also include controlling grinding of the workpiece by the grinding tool and rotation of the workpiece to provide grinding of the workpiece with a generally constant surface footage.