Compact BLDC Grinding Tool Venting for Debris Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing power tools, such as grinders, face challenges in optimizing airflow to reduce contamination from debris entering through air intake vents, leading to inefficiencies in cooling and performance.

Innovation Solution

A compact and high-power electric motor with a brushless direct-current (BLDC) design, coupled with a advanced wheel retention mechanism and electronic braking system, is integrated into a power tool housing to maintain high rotational speeds and torque while minimizing contamination and ensuring secure accessory retention during braking.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-affected harmful factors

If screens or air filters are provided on air intake vents to filter out contamination, then air quality is improved, but small amounts of leakage dust and debris still enter and overall contamination reduction is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveair qualityVSAvoidfiltration system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The harmful factor (debris-laden air) is extracted and removed from the system by directing it away from the motor through dedicated debris outlet vents, preventing contamination at the source rather than relying solely on filtration

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The air intake system is segmented into separate pathways: clean air intakes for motor cooling and debris-laden air intakes for grinding function, allowing each to be optimized independently without compromising the other

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Volume of moving object

If a compact motor design is used to reduce tool size, then portability is improved, but maintaining high power output becomes more difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemotor sizeVSAvoidpower output
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSPower

Solution Approach 1:

The motor operates at optimized parameters including 5000-6000 RPM rotational speed and controlled torque ranges (30-45 inch-lbs) to maximize power density within the compact form factor

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The motor incorporates dynamic control through electronic braking and variable speed operation, allowing the compact motor to deliver high power when needed while maintaining small size through efficient energy utilization

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Loss of time

If electronic braking is applied to stop the output spindle quickly, then operational efficiency is improved, but accessory wheel retention becomes critical to prevent detachment

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebraking timeVSAvoidaccessory retention
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The wheel retention mechanism is pre-configured with springs and retaining structures that are ready to engage the accessory wheel before braking begins, ensuring continuous retention throughout the braking process

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

Spring elements in the retention mechanism provide cushioning and continuous contact force on the accessory wheel, preventing detachment during the high-stress electronic braking event

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution enables efficient airflow, maintains high output rotational speeds and torque levels with minimal speed drop, and effectively retains accessories during braking, enhancing performance and user experience in metalworking applications.

Implementation Method 1

A compact and high-power electric motor with a brushless direct-current (BLDC) design

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectBrushless direct-current (BLDC) motor operation: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 2

the controller configured to apply an electronic brake to the motor to bring the output spindle from an output rotational speed of approximately 5,000 to 6,000 rotations-per-minute (RPM) to a full stop in less than approximately 2.2 seconds

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectronic braking: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 3

the wheel retention mechanism is configured to keep the accessory wheel having a mass of approximately 800 to 900 grams and a rotational inertial of approximately of 4.35×10−3 kg·m2 to 4.44×10−3 kg·m2 in engagement with the output spindle throughout a duration of the electronic brake

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Data Source

PatentUS20240009794A1High power grinding tool
Publication Date: 2024.01.11 BLACK & DECKER CORP
  • US20240009794A1 patent drawing
  • US20240009794A1 patent drawing
  • US20240009794A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A power tool is provided including a motor having an axial length of smaller than or equal to 65 mm and an outer diameter of smaller than or equal to 63 mm. The electric motor is configured to produce a maximum power output of greater than or equal to 2800 watts when the battery pack coupled to the battery receiver has a nominal voltage output of smaller than or equal to 60 volts and a rated capacity of approximately 9 ampere-hours (A.h.). Further, the motor drives an output spindle so as to maintain an output rotational speed of greater than 3,500 rotations-per-minute (RPM) within a torque range of 30 inch-lbs to 45 inch-lbs and exhibit a drop in the output rotational speed that is less than or equal to approximately 11.5% as the torque increases from 30 inch-lbs to 45 inch-lbs.