Grinding Wheel Topography Scheduling for Stable Aero Part Grinding

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing grinding processes for aero parts face challenges in accurately scheduling feed rates due to variations in grinding wheel topography, leading to increased scrap production and quality issues, as mere visual observations of wheel differences are insufficient for process control.

Innovation Solution

A method involving in-situ microscopy to measure grinding wheel topography, calculate parameters such as crystal density and area fraction, and use a physics-based simulator to determine optimized feed rate scheduling, incorporating power monitoring for real-time adjustments.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Difficulty of detecting and measuring

If visual observation of grinding wheel is used, then simplicity of inspection is maintained, but measurement precision of wheel topography deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinspection simplicityVSAvoidwheel topography measurement precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Difficulty of detecting and measuringVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces visual observation (optical system) with laser scanning technology to measure grinding wheel topography. The laser scanner emits laser beams that reflect off the wheel surface, and the reflected light is detected to calculate precise three-dimensional coordinates of surface points, achieving high measurement precision without relying on subjective visual inspection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a laser scanner as an intermediary device between the grinding wheel and the measurement system. The laser scanner acts as a mediator that converts physical wheel topography into digital three-dimensional coordinate data, enabling precise quantitative measurement while maintaining operational simplicity through automated data acquisition.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Ease of operation

If standardized feed rate is used, then ease of operation is maintained, but manufacturing precision of aero parts deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefeed rate control simplicityVSAvoidaero part accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms the static, standardized feed rate into a dynamic, adaptive feed rate schedule. The system continuously adjusts the feed rate based on real-time laser scanning data of wheel topography and simulated grinding forces, allowing the feed rate to vary throughout the grinding process to maintain precise control over aero part dimensions while adapting to changing wheel conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a feedback loop where laser scanning measurements of the grinding wheel are fed into a simulation model that predicts grinding forces and part deflection. These predictions are then used to adjust the feed rate schedule, creating a closed-loop control system that maintains manufacturing precision by continuously adapting to actual wheel topography rather than relying on fixed standardized rates.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Productivity

If high feed rate is used, then productivity is improved, but manufacturing precision deteriorates due to part deflection

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegrinding production rateVSAvoidaero part dimensional accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary laser scanning of the grinding wheel topography before the grinding operation begins. This advance measurement allows the simulation model to predict grinding forces and potential part deflection, enabling the system to pre-calculate an optimized feed rate schedule that maintains high productivity while compensating for expected deflection, thus achieving both high production rate and precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent dynamically changes the feed rate parameter based on simulated grinding forces and predicted part deflection. The system adjusts the feed rate schedule in real-time according to the actual wheel topography measured by laser scanning, allowing optimization of the feed rate to balance productivity and precision by adapting to specific wheel-part interaction conditions rather than using fixed high or low rates.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Ease of operation

If fixed cutting depth is used, then ease of operation is maintained, but reliability of process control deteriorates due to wheel topography variations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecutting depth setting simplicityVSAvoidprocess control consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms the static, fixed cutting depth into a dynamic cutting depth schedule that adapts to wheel topography variations. The system uses laser scanning data to measure actual wheel surface profile and adjusts the cutting depth throughout the grinding process to maintain consistent material removal rates and surface quality, ensuring reliable process control despite variations in wheel condition.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback control where laser scanning measurements of wheel topography are continuously fed into the control system. The measured wheel surface variations are used to adjust the cutting depth schedule in real-time, creating a closed-loop system that maintains reliable and consistent process control by compensating for wheel topography changes rather than relying on fixed predetermined depths.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS12589459B2In-situ grinding wheel topography, power monitoring, and feed/speed scheduling systems and methods
Publication Date: 2026.03.31 RTX CORP
  • US12589459B2 patent drawing
  • US12589459B2 patent drawing
  • US12589459B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Feed rate scheduling methods include measuring a topography of a grinding wheel of a machine tool, calculating a topography parameter using the topography, and calculating a feed rate scheduling parameter for a toolpath of the grinding wheel based on the topography parameter. The topography may be measured using microscopy. The topography parameter may include a plurality of parameters including a density of crystals at a given depth (C(h)) of the grinding wheel and/or an area fraction of crystals protruding at a given depth (α(h)) of the grinding wheel. The feed rate scheduling parameter may include a grinding wheel feed rate, a grinding wheel spin rate, and/or a grinding wheel cutting depth, among other parameters.