Grinding Worm Axial Displacement for Noise Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for grinding with a grinding worm fail to effectively improve noise behavior and productivity due to complex implementations and suboptimal surface structure modifications.

Innovation Solution

The grinding worm's axial displacement movement is composed of alternating sections in opposite directions, allowing for a modified surface structure on the tooth flank that breaks continuous grinding marks, enhancing noise behavior and productivity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-affected harmful factors

If a shift movement is applied during grinding to modify surface structure and improve noise behavior, then noise behavior is improved, but the grinding process becomes more complex and productivity decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenoise behaviorVSAvoidproductivity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The grinding worm applies a periodic shift movement with alternating directions during the grinding process. The displacement consists of at least a first section moving in one direction and a second section moving in the opposite direction, creating periodic variations in the surface structure that improve noise behavior while maintaining productivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The shift movement is made dynamic by allowing the grinding worm to change direction during the grinding process. The displacement movement includes alternating sections where the grinding worm moves first in one direction and then in the opposite direction, creating a dynamic surface modification that improves noise characteristics

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Object-affected harmful factors

If a shift movement is applied during grinding to modify surface structure, then noise behavior is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenoise behaviorVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The grinding worm serves multiple functions: it performs the primary grinding operation and simultaneously applies the shift movement to modify surface structure. This multi-functionality reduces device complexity by eliminating the need for separate mechanisms to generate the shift movement

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The shift movement function is merged with the grinding operation. The displacement movement of the grinding worm in alternating directions combines the grinding action with the surface modification action, reducing the need for additional independent systems

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Duration of action of stationary object

If small shift amounts are used to compensate for wear, then tool life is extended, but the surface structure remains regular and noise behavior is not improved

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetool lifeVSAvoidnoise behavior
Core Design Contradiction:
Duration of action of stationary objectVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The periodic alternating shift movement creates regular variations in the surface structure that interrupt parallel grinding tracks. This periodic action modifies the surface topology to reduce noise while the controlled shift amounts maintain acceptable tool life

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The alternating direction shift movement creates asymmetric surface patterns that disrupt the formation of regular parallel grinding tracks. The asymmetric displacement in opposite directions generates a more varied surface structure that improves noise behavior

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach simplifies the shifting process, improves noise behavior, and increases productivity by creating areas with diverse structures on the tooth flank, reducing dressing times and tool costs.

Implementation Method 1

a grinding process of the profiling is carried out by moving the grinding worm in the direction of the axis of the workpiece

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAbrasion: Abrasion

Data Source

PatentEP2929970B1Method for grinding of a workpiece with a grinding worm
Publication Date: 2019.11.06 KAPP WERKZEUGMASCH
  • EP2929970B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2929970B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2929970B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The invention relates to a method for hard finishing a workpiece (1) with a helical machining tool (2), wherein the workpiece (1) has an axis (a) and is provided with a profile (3) over its circumference, wherein the machining tool (2) has an axis (b) and is provided with a machining surface (4), wherein, with the machining surface (4) engaging the profile (3), a hard machining operation of the profile (3) is carried out by simultaneously rotating the workpiece (1) about its axis (a) and the machining tool (2) about its axis (b) in a synchronized manner, by moving the machining tool (2) in the direction of the axis (a) of the workpiece (1), wherein, during the hard machining operation, a displacement movement in the direction of the axis (b) of the machining tool (2) is superimposed on the machining tool (2).To achieve improved noise characteristics during operation of the workpiece, the invention provides that the displacement movement consists of at least a first section (5) in which the machining tool (2) is moved in one direction (R1) of its axis (b), and of at least a second section (6) in which the machining tool (2) is moved in the other direction (R2) of its axis (b).