Multi-Thread Grinding Worm Dressing With Fault Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for monitoring the dressing process of grinding worms are unreliable, particularly in cases of partial chipping, leading to higher tool and manufacturing costs due to incomplete dressing processes.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a method that involves measuring and combining process parameters during dressing strokes, comparing them to predetermined ranges, and outputting signals for non-compliant data to ensure process safety and quality assessment.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If current monitoring with fixed envelope curves is used to monitor the dressing process, then the monitoring system is simple to implement, but it cannot reliably detect partial chipping and leads to false conclusions about dressing quality

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedressing process monitoring reliabilityVSAvoidmonitoring system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The monitoring system is segmented into multiple independent evaluation criteria: individual stroke evaluation, multi-stroke sequence evaluation, and multi-thread comparison evaluation. Each segment analyzes specific aspects of the dressing process independently, then combines results to form a comprehensive quality assessment. This segmentation enables reliable detection of partial chipping without requiring a single complex monitoring system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes from monitoring a single current parameter with fixed thresholds to analyzing multiple process parameters including current, dressing depth, stroke position, and thread-specific characteristics. By dynamically adjusting evaluation parameters based on the specific dressing stroke and thread being processed, the system achieves high reliability while maintaining manageable complexity through parameter adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If the grinding worm diameter decreases due to continuous grinding and dressing, then the grinding worm needs to be replaced sooner, but fixed envelope curves do not adapt to these changes and reduce monitoring accuracy

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedressing process measurement accuracyVSAvoidmonitoring system adaptability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The monitoring system transitions from static fixed envelope curves to dynamic adaptive evaluation criteria that automatically adjust based on the current grinding worm state. The system dynamically determines expected current ranges based on the specific dressing stroke, thread position, and accumulated wear, enabling accurate monitoring throughout the grinding worm's service life without requiring manual recalibration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms where monitoring results from previous dressing strokes and threads inform the evaluation criteria for subsequent operations. By continuously learning from actual dressing outcomes and comparing against expected patterns, the system maintains high measurement accuracy and adapts to the gradual diameter reduction of the grinding worm over time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If individual worm threads are monitored separately during dressing, then partial chipping can be detected, but the overall dressing quality assessment becomes more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepartial chipping detection accuracyVSAvoiddata processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The monitoring approach segments the multi-thread dressing process into independent evaluation units, where each thread and stroke is assessed separately for anomalies like partial chipping. This segmentation enables precise detection of localized defects. The segmented data is then systematically aggregated using defined evaluation rules that maintain reliability while managing complexity through structured data processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system merges individual thread monitoring results into a comprehensive dressing quality assessment by combining data from multiple threads and strokes. Through systematic aggregation rules that consider both individual thread anomalies and overall process patterns, the system achieves reliable partial chipping detection while maintaining manageable data processing complexity through structured integration of segmented information.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS20230398620A1Method for dressing a multi-flight worm grinding wheel for grinding teeth or similar profiles
Publication Date: 2023.12.14 KAPP NILES GMBH & CO KG
  • US20230398620A1 patent drawing
  • US20230398620A1 patent drawing
  • US20230398620A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for dressing a multi-thread grinding worm for the grinding of toothings, wherein the grinding worm includes a plurality of worm threads that are each dressed by a dressing tool with at least one dressing stroke to provide the grinding worm with a desired profile. The method includes: a) dressing a first worm thread, wherein at least one process parameter is measured and recorded during the dressing process; b) dressing a further worm thread, wherein the process parameter is measured and recorded during the dressing process; c) after dressing all worm threads: combining the recorded data of the process parameter; d) comparing the combined data of the process parameter with data stored in a machine controller and checking whether the combined data are within a predefined admissible range; e) outputting a signal if the combined data are not within the predefined admissible range.