Sewing Machine Gripper Bobbin Braking and Ejection Mechanism

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing lockstitch sewing machine loopers are complex and fail to effectively prevent bobbin advancement when sewing speed is reduced or the machine is stopped, with braking and ejection functions not being adequately separated.

Innovation Solution

A simplified design where the braking of the bobbin is achieved through a dedicated brake spring and the ejection is facilitated by a separate ejection spring, with a locking lever mechanism that separates these functions, allowing for optimal braking force and easy bobbin removal.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If a single spring mechanism is used for both braking and ejection, then the device complexity is reduced, but the braking reliability deteriorates because the spring force cannot be optimized for both functions simultaneously

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegripper structureVSAvoidbraking reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The single spring mechanism is segmented into two separate spring mechanisms: a first spring (brake spring) dedicated to braking the spool and a second spring (ejection spring) dedicated to ejecting the spool. This segmentation allows each spring to be independently optimized for its specific function, with the brake spring providing reliable braking force and the ejection spring providing sufficient ejection force, thereby resolving the contradiction between device complexity and braking reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Reliability

If the brake spring force is increased to prevent bobbin advancement, then the braking reliability is improved, but the ejection capability deteriorates because the same spring cannot provide sufficient force for both braking and ejection

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebraking reliabilityVSAvoidbobbin ejection
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The spring mechanism is segmented into a first spring for braking and a second spring for ejection. The first spring can be designed with higher force characteristics to ensure reliable braking, while the second spring is designed with appropriate force for easy ejection. This segmentation eliminates the compromise that would be necessary with a single spring, allowing both braking reliability and ease of ejection to be optimized independently.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Reliability

If a complex locking device is used to separate braking and ejection functions, then the functional separation is achieved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefunctional separationVSAvoidlocking device structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of using a complex locking device, the patent segments the spring mechanisms themselves into functionally independent components. The first spring is positioned and configured to act solely on the spool for braking, while the second spring is positioned to act solely on the spool for ejection. This functional segmentation through separate spring mechanisms achieves reliable function separation without requiring additional complex locking devices or mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design ensures the bobbin is securely braked against unwanted movement at reduced sewing speeds and allows for easy bobbin exchange, enhancing operational simplicity and efficiency.

Implementation Method 1

a brake spring (36) which acts on the spool (26) in a braking manner

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

an ejection spring (34) which is arranged between the bottom (33) of the bobbin case (21) and the bearing plate (32) and which serves to push out the spool (26) from the bobbin case (21)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpring force: Spring

Data Source

PatentEP2103725B1Gripper for a double lock-stitch sewing machine
Publication Date: 2011.04.13 DURKOPP ADLER GMBH
  • EP2103725B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2103725B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2103725B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The gripper (8) has a bobbin case (21) moveably arranged around a vertical axis (9) in a gripper-body (24) and comprising a base (33) and a bearing pin (25) concentric to the axis. A spool supporting device (31a) is movably arranged on the bearing pin in a direction of the axis for retaining a gripper thread bobbin (26). An extended spring (34) e.g. conical spring, is arranged between the base and the spool supporting device. A brake spring (36) e.g. flat disk spring, is operated between the spool supporting device and the gripper thread bobbin.