Robotic Gripper Brake Control for Fast Closing and Slip Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Robotic grippers face challenges in achieving high closing speeds without excessive peak force, early braking mechanism decay, complex user training, and vulnerability to data cable damage, which can lead to object slipping and loss.

Innovation Solution

A robotic gripper design featuring a DC motor, reduction gear mechanism, and a backdrivable mechanism that allows for controlled force application, object slip detection, and reduced cabling through a connector system, enabling efficient object handling and reduced motor overheating.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If the gripper closes at higher speed, then productivity is improved, but the peak force becomes much higher than the desired pinch force which could damage the object

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclosing speedVSAvoidpeak force
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The gripper employs dynamic control of the motor during the closing operation. The motor is accelerated to a speed higher than needed for the final closing speed, then rapidly decelerated upon object contact. This dynamic approach allows the gripper to achieve high closing speeds while the controlled deceleration ensures the peak force remains within safe limits (less than 60% greater than holding force).

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the motor speed parameter dynamically during operation. The motor is driven at varying speeds - higher during approach and closing, then reduced upon contact. This parameter change allows the gripper to optimize both closing speed and force application, resolving the contradiction between productivity and object safety.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Force

If the motor is engaged at full capacity to hold the object, then the holding force is sufficient, but the motor overheats

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveholding forceVSAvoidmotor temperature
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSTemperature

Solution Approach 1:

The braking mechanism serves a dual function: it rapidly stops the motor during closing operations and also maintains holding force without requiring continuous motor engagement. This self-service approach allows the system to use the brake for both stopping and holding, eliminating the need for the motor to run continuously at full capacity and preventing overheating.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The holding function is extracted from the motor and transferred to the braking mechanism. Instead of the motor continuously providing holding force (which causes overheating), the brake takes over this function after the closing operation is complete. This separation of functions allows the motor to be disengaged during holding, preventing thermal issues.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Speed

If a traditional braking mechanism is used to stop the motor, then the motor can be stopped, but the brake has a fall or decay time before engagement which delays the stopping

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemotor stopping speedVSAvoidbrake engagement time
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The braking mechanism is pre-positioned and pre-loaded during the motor acceleration phase. As the motor approaches its target speed, the brake is already in place and ready for immediate engagement. This preliminary preparation eliminates the fall or decay time that would otherwise delay brake engagement, allowing for rapid stopping when object contact is detected.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The braking mechanism maintains continuous readiness throughout the closing operation. Rather than engaging the brake from a neutral state, the system keeps the brake in a pre-charged, ready-to-engage state throughout the approach and closing phases. This continuous preparation ensures immediate brake response when needed, eliminating engagement delays.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The gripper achieves high closing speeds with forces close to the holding force, detects object slipping, simplifies user training, and minimizes data cable damage, ensuring secure object handling and extended motor life.

Implementation Method 1

DC motor

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic induction: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 2

reduction gear mechanism

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGear transmission: Gear

Implementation Method 3

brake

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Data Source

PatentUS12103180B2Robotic gripper
Publication Date: 2024.10.01 ROBOTIQ INC
  • US12103180B2 patent drawing
  • US12103180B2 patent drawing
  • US12103180B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In one aspect, the present disclosure provides a robot gripper with a closing mechanism that while providing a desirable closing speed avoids exerting a force on the rigid object which is greater than the holding force required to hold the rigid object in the gripper. In another aspect, the present invention provides a robot gripper capable of detecting a slip or loss of an object held by the gripper. In an alternative aspect, the present invention provides a robot gripper capable of being hand guided. In another aspect, the invention provides a robot gripper brake drive circuit with faster operation. In one other aspect, the invention provides a connector for connecting a robot end effector to a robot arm with an adjustable cable.