Gripper Hand Sensor System for Robotic Arm Collision Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional inspection techniques for robotic arms in semiconductor assembly lines are inefficient and require significant overhead, often resulting in unsatisfactory results, as they rely heavily on manual processes and lack effective automated methods for quality control and maintenance.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a gripper hand sensor system on robotic arms that collects and analyzes sensor data to detect adverse conditions, such as imminent collisions or wafer malfunctions, allowing for automated adjustments or halting of the robotic arm routine to prevent damage and ensure proper operation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual inspection techniques are used for robotic arm functionality, then inspection can be performed, but the robotic arm and assembly line must go offline, resulting in loss of time and reduced productivity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinspection accuracyVSAvoidassembly line downtime
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The sensor system performs continuous monitoring of robotic arm functionality before actual failures or performance degradation occur. By detecting adverse conditions early through sensors on the gripper hand, the system can take preliminary corrective actions while the assembly line remains operational, avoiding unplanned downtime and maintaining productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The robotic arm system performs self-inspection through integrated sensors that continuously monitor its own functionality, position, and operational status. This self-monitoring capability eliminates the need for external manual inspection that would require taking the system offline, allowing continuous operation while maintaining reliability through automated detection of adverse conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If manual inspection techniques are used for robotic arm functionality, then inspection can be performed, but large amounts of overhead and expensive hardware are required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinspection accuracyVSAvoidinspection system overhead
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The sensor system serves multiple functions simultaneously: it monitors robotic arm position, detects adverse conditions, prevents collisions, and tracks operational status. By integrating these diverse inspection and monitoring functions into a single sensor-based system on the gripper hand, the patent eliminates the need for separate inspection equipment and reduces overall system complexity and overhead.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual mechanical inspection processes with electronic sensor-based detection. Sensors on the gripper hand electronically monitor robotic arm functionality and detect adverse conditions, substituting the need for physical manual inspection and reducing the overhead associated with mechanical inspection systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Productivity

If no specific inspection techniques are used, then the system operates continuously, but collision detection and safety monitoring are insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontinuous operationVSAvoidcollision detection capability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The sensor system continuously provides feedback about the robotic arm's operational status, position, and environmental conditions. This real-time feedback enables the control system to detect adverse conditions such as imminent collisions and adjust operations accordingly, maintaining both continuous productivity and high reliability through proactive safety monitoring.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The sensor system detects adverse conditions before they result in actual damage or safety incidents. By identifying potential collisions or malfunction indicators in advance, the system can take preliminary corrective actions to prevent harmful events, thereby maintaining continuous operation while ensuring high reliability through proactive protection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

Data Source

PatentUS11664265B2Systems and methods for robotic arm sensing
Publication Date: 2023.05.30 TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING CO LTD
  • US11664265B2 patent drawing
  • US11664265B2 patent drawing
  • US11664265B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In an embodiment, a robotic arm includes: a base; at least one link secured to the base; a gripper secured to the at least one link, wherein: the gripper comprises a finger, the gripper is configured to secure a wafer while the at least one link is in motion, and the gripper is configured to release the wafer while the at least one link is stopped, a sensor disposed on the finger, the sensor configured to collect sensor data characterizing the robotic arm's interaction with a semiconductor processing chamber while the wafer is secured using the finger.