Gripping Device with Independent Clamping Mechanism

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Anthropomorphic gripping devices face difficulties in securely gripping and handling heavy components with their center of gravity outside the imaginary line between gripper fingers, especially under external forces, and struggle with objects like pans and bread slicers.

Innovation Solution

The introduction of a tensioning device that can be actuated independently of the gripping fingers, allowing for the use of clamping components with holding sections that interact with the base part, and the incorporation of displaceable locking elements and spring elements to securely fix heavy components, along with magnetic or suction clamping options.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Force

If anthropomorphic gripping devices use only gripping fingers to hold components, then the device structure remains simple, but the gripping force is insufficient for heavy components with center of gravity outside the finger line

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegripping forceVSAvoiddevice structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The gripping device is divided into two independent subsystems: gripping fingers for light components and a clamping device with locking elements for heavy components. This segmentation allows each subsystem to be optimized for its specific function without compromising the other, resolving the contradiction between maintaining simple structure and increasing gripping force capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The base part is designed to accommodate both gripping fingers and a clamping device with locking elements, enabling the same device to handle both light components (using fingers) and heavy components (using clamping device). This multi-functionality resolves the contradiction by allowing the device to adapt its complexity based on the component weight.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Reliability

If gripping fingers are used alone, then the device operates simply, but it cannot securely handle heavy components under external forces

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecure handlingVSAvoiddevice structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The clamping device with locking elements is positioned to engage with holding sections on the component before the component is subjected to external forces during handling. This preliminary action of clamping and locking ensures that when external forces act on heavy components, the device is already prepared to resist them, thereby improving reliability without requiring complex real-time adjustments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The clamping device acts as an intermediary between the base part and heavy components, providing a mechanical locking interface through locking elements and holding sections. This intermediary mechanism transfers and distributes external forces securely, enabling reliable handling of heavy components under various external forces without direct reliance on gripping fingers alone.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Force

If a clamping device with locking elements is added, then heavy components can be securely fixed, but the device structure becomes more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclamping forceVSAvoiddevice structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The locking elements are designed to automatically engage with the holding sections when the clamping device is actuated, utilizing spring elements for automatic resetting. This self-service mechanism reduces the need for complex control systems and manual intervention, allowing the clamping device to provide high clamping force while minimizing the overall complexity of the device structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Ease of operation

If gripping fingers are used for all components, then the device design remains simple, but it fails to provide sufficient support for components with center of gravity outside the finger line

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehandling capabilityVSAvoiddevice structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The base part is designed with universal compatibility to accommodate both gripping fingers and a clamping device with locking elements, allowing the same device to handle both light components (using fingers) and heavy components (using clamping device). This multi-functionality resolves the contradiction by allowing the device to adapt its complexity based on the component weight and handling requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables the secure handling of both small and heavy components by providing additional gripping force and mechanical locking, allowing for safe handling of objects like pots, pans, and knives that were previously difficult for anthropomorphic grippers to manage.

Implementation Method 1

spring elements are provided which urge the locking elements into the locking position or release position

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpring force: Spring

Implementation Method 2

The clamping device can also be designed as a magnetic clamping device. The holding sections can then be fixed to the base part by means of magnetic forces.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic forces: Magnetism

Implementation Method 3

the magnetic forces are compensated for by means of electromagnetic fields in order to release the clamping component from the base part

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic fields: Electromagnet

Implementation Method 4

The clamping device can also be designed as a suction clamping device, with the holding sections being fixed by means of forces provided by negative or positive pressure.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectNegative pressure: Pressure Gradient

Data Source

PatentEP3352954B1Gripping device
Publication Date: 2020.03.25 SCHUNK GMBH & CO KG
  • EP3352954B1 patent drawingFigure 1~3
  • EP3352954B1 patent drawingFigure 4~5
  • EP3352954B1 patent drawingFigure 6~7

AI summary

The invention relates to a gripping device (10, 40, 50), comprising a base part (12, 52) and gripping fingers (4) for gripping gripping components, which gripping fingers are movably arranged on the base part (12, 52), characterized in that a clamping device (22, 54) is additionally provided on the base part (12, 52), which clamping device interacts with at least one holding segment (30) provided on a clamping component (28) in order to fasten the clamping component (28) to the base part (12, 52).