Grooving Insert with Arrowhead Chip Former

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing chip-control arrangements for cutting inserts in metalworking operations are inadequate for effectively managing the flow and shape of swarf and debris, particularly in internal grooving operations, as they lack a comprehensive design to efficiently deflect and evacuate chips.

Innovation Solution

A cutting insert with a chip-control arrangement featuring a depression, an interposed projection, and lateral protuberances on the rake surface, which includes a depression declining surface and a rake ascending surface, designed to deflect and curve chips, enhancing chip evacuation and management during grooving and groove-turning operations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If conventional chip-control arrangements are used, then the structure is simple, but chip evacuation efficiency is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechip evacuation efficiencyVSAvoidchip-control arrangement structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The chip-control arrangement is segmented into multiple functional elements: a depression with declining surface, an interposed projection, and lateral protuberances. Each segment performs a specific function in chip deflection and evacuation, transforming the simple conventional structure into a multi-component system that enhances chip management efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The chip-control arrangement extends into the third dimension with vertical features (depression depth, projection height, protuberance elevation) in addition to horizontal positioning. This dimensional complexity allows chips to be deflected and evacuated through multiple spatial pathways, improving evacuation efficiency beyond what flat two-dimensional controls can achieve.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Productivity

If chip flow control is enhanced, then chip management improves, but the space required increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechip flow control efficiencyVSAvoidrake surface area
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of modifying the entire rake surface, the invention applies localized features (depression, projection, protuberances) at specific critical locations. The depression is positioned to intercept chips immediately behind the cutting edge, while the projection and protuberances are strategically placed to guide chip flow, concentrating control efforts where most needed rather than across the whole surface.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The rake surface is functionally segmented into distinct zones: the depression zone for initial chip interception, the projection zone for mid-stage deflection, and the protuberance zone for final evacuation guidance. This segmentation allows efficient chip control within a compact area by assigning specific control functions to specific spatial zones.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Manufacturing precision

If complex chip-deflecting features are added, then chip shape control improves, but manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechip shape controlVSAvoidinsert fabrication
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple chip-control functions (depression formation, projection elevation, protuberance formation) are merged into a single monolithic cutting insert body. This integration allows all features to be manufactured simultaneously as one piece using conventional CNC machining or forming processes, avoiding the need for separate assembly steps or complex multi-stage manufacturing procedures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention controls chip shape by varying geometric parameters of the features: depression depth and slope angle, projection height and length, protuberance size and positioning. By adjusting these parameters, different chip shapes and evacuation patterns can be achieved without changing the fundamental structure or manufacturing process, allowing precise chip control through parameter optimization rather than structural complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS10384268B1Grooving insert having rearwardly pointing arrowhead-shaped chip former
Publication Date: 2019.08.20 ISCAR LTD
  • US10384268B1 patent drawing
  • US10384268B1 patent drawing
  • US10384268B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A cutting insert has a cutting edge formed at an intersection of a rake surface and a relief surface, with a chip-control arrangement located at the rake surface. The chip-control arrangement includes a depression that includes a depression declining surface that extends downwardly in a direction away from the major cutting edge. A chip deflecting surface located rearward of the depression is inclined upwardly in a direction away from the major cutting edge. A chip former includes an interposed projection that extends from the chip deflecting surface to the depression declining surface, and two lateral protuberances that extend from opposite sides of the interposed projection to the depression declining surface beyond a forwardmost portion of the interposed projection.