Ground Distance Training System for Landing Oscillation Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Aircraft landings, particularly for new pilots, pose challenges in managing ground effect and oscillations, which can result in damage to the plane and injury, as existing methods rely heavily on trial and error rather than providing real-time feedback.

Innovation Solution

A dynamic ground distance training system using emitters and receivers to process energy signals and provide audible feedback through headsets, alerting pilots of optimal landing height and oscillations, with alerts such as 'go around' or 'add power' based on measured distances and speeds.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If pilots rely on trial and error to learn ground effect and landing techniques, then they can eventually develop landing skills, but the learning process is prolonged and increases the risk of damage or injury

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelanding safetyVSAvoidlearning curve
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system provides real-time audible feedback to pilots during landing approach by measuring vertical distance to runway and ground effect zone boundaries. The feedback signal changes frequency or intensity based on aircraft height, providing continuous guidance to help pilots master ground effect and proper flare technique, thereby reducing the learning curve and improving landing safety.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system预先 identifies and communicates the ground effect zone boundary to the pilot before the aircraft enters it. By providing advance warning and continuous feedback as the aircraft approaches and enters the GEZ, the system allows pilots to prepare and adjust their landing technique in advance, rather than learning through trial and error during actual landing attempts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Object-affected harmful factors

If pilots attempt to manage ground effect and oscillations without real-time feedback, then the system remains simple, but the risk of propeller strikes and injury increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverisk of propeller strike and injuryVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system continuously monitors aircraft vertical position relative to the runway and ground effect zone, and provides real-time audible feedback to the pilot. This feedback loop enables pilots to make immediate corrections to their landing technique, reducing the risk of oscillations and propeller strikes while managing system complexity through straightforward sensor and speaker integration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces the need for complex mechanical landing gear indicators or visual markers with an electronic sensing and audio feedback system. By using electromagnetic or acoustic sensors to detect aircraft position and converting this information into audible signals, the system reduces physical complexity while enhancing safety through real-time information provision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Loss of information

If visual cues alone are used to guide landing, then the system remains simple, but pilots lack real-time information about ground effect zone and optimal landing height

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinformation about ground effect and optimal heightVSAvoidfeedback system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system provides real-time audible feedback that conveys information about aircraft height relative to the runway and ground effect zone boundary. This feedback fills the information gap left by visual cues alone, giving pilots continuous verbal or auditory guidance about their vertical position and when to execute the flare, thereby reducing information loss without requiring overly complex system architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an intermediary audio feedback mechanism that translates complex sensor data about aircraft position and ground effect zone boundaries into simple, intuitive audible signals for the pilot. This intermediary layer converts raw measurement data into actionable information, reducing the complexity of information processing while enhancing the pilot's understanding of their landing trajectory and ground effect conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system reduces the learning curve for pilots by providing real-time feedback, enhancing landing skills, reducing stress, anxiety, and the risk of injury or property damage by helping pilots master ground effect and oscillations during landings.

Implementation Method 1

one or more emitters facing downward direct signal of focused energy (or sound and/or light) towards the runway and said focused energy signal is reflected from the runway then is received by one or more receivers positioned generally downward

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSignal reflection: Reflection

Implementation Method 2

at least one of vertical and horizontal distances based on the time intervals when sampling signal reflections is determined

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTime of flight measurement: Time of Flight

Data Source

PatentUS20250006065A1Real time alert for landing airplanes
Publication Date: 2025.01.02 KRIETZMAN MARK
  • US20250006065A1 patent drawing
  • US20250006065A1 patent drawing
  • US20250006065A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A dynamic ground distance training system and method of training for pilots including one or more emitters facing downward direct signal of focused energy (or sound and/or light) towards the runway and said focused energy signal is reflected from the runway; the reflected signal is received by one or more receivers positioned generally downward; and, the energy signal is processed via microprocessor(s) and a distance based on the time intervals when sampling signal reflections is determined.