Ground Expanded Graphite Agglomerates for Polymer Composites

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Expanded graphite's poor processability and dustiness make it difficult to handle and incorporate into polymer composites, leading to flow problems and reduced mechanical and thermal conductivity in final products.

Innovation Solution

Ground expanded graphite agglomerates in granular form are developed, which are soft and deagglomerate easily into finer particles during processing, improving handling and dispersion within polymers while maintaining thermal and electrical conductivity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Temperature

If expanded graphite is added to polymer mass to increase thermal conductivity, then thermal conductivity is improved, but processability and workability deteriorate due to difficult handling and flow problems

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvethermal conductivityVSAvoidprocessability
Core Design Contradiction:
TemperatureVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The expanded graphite is segmented into smaller particles with sizes between 0.1-2.0 mm through grinding and classification processes. This segmentation improves flow characteristics and feedability into extruders while maintaining the thermal conductivity benefits of expanded graphite structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The particle size parameter of expanded graphite is changed from larger flake forms to controlled smaller sizes (0.1-2.0 mm) through mechanical grinding and air classification. This parameter change resolves the contradiction by improving processability while preserving thermal conductivity through maintained expanded graphite morphology.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If expanded graphite is used as conductive filler, then electrical conductivity is improved, but dustiness increases making handling difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveelectrical conductivityVSAvoiddustiness
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The expanded graphite is divided into controlled particle sizes (0.1-2.0 mm) through grinding and classification, which reduces excessive dust generation while maintaining electrical conductivity properties of the expanded graphite structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Productivity

If expanded graphite particles are fed into extruder, then conductive composite is produced, but flow problems occur reducing productivity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveextrusion rateVSAvoidfeedability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The expanded graphite is segmented into optimal particle sizes (0.1-2.0 mm) that improve flow characteristics and feedability into extruders, directly resolving the feedability problem and enabling consistent extrusion processes with maintained productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The expanded graphite undergoes preliminary grinding and air classification to achieve optimal particle size distribution before being fed into the extruder. This preliminary action prevents flow problems during extrusion and ensures smooth processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Ease of operation

If ground expanded graphite is compacted into agglomerates, then handling properties improve, but particle hardness increases reducing deagglomeration

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehandling propertiesVSAvoidparticle hardness
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The compaction parameters are optimized to create agglomerates with controlled hardness that balance handling improvement with adequate deagglomeration capability during mixing. The particle strength parameter is carefully adjusted to resolve the contradiction between handling and deagglomeration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The ground expanded graphite agglomerates enhance the feedability and mechanical stability of conductive polymer composites, ensuring consistent thermal and electrical conductivity comparable to pristine expanded graphite, with improved handling and reduced dustiness.

Implementation Method 1

the agglomerates offer better handling properties as compared to unprocessed expanded graphite, which inter alia offers easier feeding of the graphite additive to the polymer during the production of the conductive polymer

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDeagglomeration:

Data Source

PatentEP2603454B2Ground expanded graphite agglomerates, methods of making, and applications of the same
Publication Date: 2020.11.25 IMERYS GRAPHITE & CARBON SWITZERLAND
  • EP2603454B2 patent drawingFigure 1~2a
  • EP2603454B2 patent drawingFigure 2b~2c
  • EP2603454B2 patent drawingFigure 3a~3b

AI summary

The present disclosure relates to ground expanded graphite agglomerate compositions, methods for making such agglomerates, their use as conductive additive, and conductive composites comprising such ground expanded graphite agglomerates. The disclosure also pertains to methods for making such composites and the use of such composites in preparing thermally conductive materials. The agglomerates are characterized by a certain softness allowing the agglomerates to dissolve, e.g., through shear forces applied during compounding, thereby leading to an improved feedability and a highly homogenous distribution of the expanded graphite material in the composite matrix.