Ground Fault Protection Circuit with Reverse Connection Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional ground fault circuit interrupters (GFCIs) lack comprehensive reverse connection detection, require manual testing for functionality verification, and have a simple power supply detection mechanism, leading to safety risks due to potential incorrect installations and delayed detection of failures.

Innovation Solution

A ground fault protection circuit with integrated reverse connection detection and execution, automatic leakage detection, and enhanced power supply detection and indication using a microcontroller control circuit, signal amplifying and shaping circuit, and power supply detection and indicator circuit, which includes a simulation leakage circuit for automatic testing and timely fault notification.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional GFCI uses simple power supply detection, then device complexity is reduced, but reliability of fault detection deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefault detection reliabilityVSAvoiddetection circuit complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The detection system is segmented into multiple independent detection modules: power supply detection module, leakage detection module, and reverse connection detection module. Each module independently monitors specific parameters, improving overall detection reliability without requiring a single complex circuit.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The microcontroller unit serves multiple functions: it controls the tripping mechanism, processes detection signals from all modules, manages indicator lights, and performs automatic self-testing. This multi-functionality improves reliability through centralized intelligent control while avoiding the need for separate dedicated circuits for each function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Loss of time

If conventional GFCI requires manual testing, then device complexity is reduced, but loss of time for safety verification increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety verification timeVSAvoidtesting mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs automatic self-testing during the power-on phase and at scheduled intervals without requiring user intervention. The detection modules are activated in advance to verify system functionality, eliminating the need for manual testing and reducing safety verification time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors its own operational status through feedback from detection modules and provides real-time status indication through LED lights. This closed-loop feedback mechanism automatically verifies safety conditions and notifies users of any faults, eliminating the need for manual testing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If conventional GFCI lacks reverse connection detection, then device complexity is reduced, but reliability of protection function deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprotection function reliabilityVSAvoiddetection circuit complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The reverse connection detection is implemented as a separate dedicated module that independently monitors the polarity of power supply connections. This segmentation allows the reverse connection detection function to be added without redesigning the entire detection system, maintaining reliability while managing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The microcontroller unit acts as an intermediary that receives signals from the reverse connection detection module and processes this information to control the tripping mechanism and indicator lights. This intermediary approach integrates the new detection function into the existing system architecture without requiring direct complex interconnections between all components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Loss of information

If conventional GFCI uses simple indicator circuit, then device complexity is reduced, but loss of information about system status increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem status informationVSAvoidindicator circuit complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Different colored LED indicators are used to represent different system states: green LED indicates normal operation, red LED indicates fault conditions, and yellow LED indicates warning states. This color-coded information system provides comprehensive status information in an easily distinguishable visual format without requiring complex display circuits.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #32Color changes

Solution Approach 2:

The indicator circuit is designed to serve multiple functions: it displays power supply status, leakage detection status, reverse connection status, and self-test results all through the same LED system. This multi-functional indicator reduces the need for separate dedicated indicators for each status, managing complexity while providing comprehensive information.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution enables automatic verification of correct GFCI installation, prompt notification of leakage detection failures, and improved safety by reducing the burden on users and preventing safety risks associated with delayed recognition of GFCI failures.

Implementation Method 1

The ground fault detection circuit includes a current coupling induction coil T1 and a capacitor C6 connected in parallel to two terminals of the current coupling induction coil T1

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic induction: Electromagnetic Induction

Data Source

PatentUS10033180B2Ground fault protection circuit and ground fault circuit interrupter
Publication Date: 2018.07.24 CHEN ZE
  • US10033180B2 patent drawing
  • US10033180B2 patent drawing
  • US10033180B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention relates to a ground fault protection circuit and a ground fault circuit interrupter. A ground fault protection circuit may include a power supply circuit, a ground fault detection circuit, a signal amplifying and shaping circuit, a microcontroller control circuit, a power supply detection and indicator circuit, a tripping mechanism control circuit, and a reverse grounding detection and execution circuit. A ground fault circuit interrupter may comprise an interrupter body with a ground fault protection circuit in the interrupter body. The practice of the present disclosure may address installation safety risks of conventional ground fault circuit interrupters and arc fault circuit interrupter and improve the safety of ground fault circuit interrupters.