Ground-Level Radar Detection for Incoming Munitions

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current radar systems are ineffective in detecting high-speed, low-flying rockets due to limited range, low radar cross-section, and latency issues, making them inadequate for providing timely warnings at smaller military bases.

Innovation Solution

A radar system with a transmitter, receiver, and antennas oriented to include ground-level coverage, employing a Continuous Wave (CW) or pulsed radar with a Doppler filter to reject signals outside predetermined velocity limits, providing rapid detection and alert capabilities without minimum range limitations and electronic or mechanical scanning, which reduces latency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If radar systems are designed specifically for weapon locating with scanning beams, then detection capability for low-flying rockets is improved, but detection latency increases making detection too late for effective warning

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection capabilityVSAvoiddetection latency
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The radar beam is pre-oriented to include ground level coverage where rockets are most likely to appear, eliminating the need for scanning and enabling immediate detection of incoming threats

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses electronic beam steering to dynamically adjust and track the radar beam towards detected targets, maintaining optimal detection capability without mechanical scanning delays

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Measurement precision

If conventional radars are used with minimum range limitations, then detection of distant targets is possible, but detection of rockets launched from short ranges is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection rangeVSAvoidcoverage of short-range threats
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The radar coverage is segmented into multiple zones including near-field and far-field regions, with different beam orientations optimized for each zone to ensure comprehensive detection across all ranges

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The radar system adds angular dimension coverage by orienting beams at different elevation angles including ground level, enabling detection of targets at various ranges and trajectories that conventional single-beam radars miss

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Area of stationary object

If radar systems employ electronic or mechanical scanning to cover all directions, then comprehensive surveillance is achieved, but system complexity and detection latency increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesurveillance coverageVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The surveillance area is divided into multiple fixed beam zones, each covered by a dedicated receiver chain with optimized beam orientation, eliminating the need for complex scanning mechanisms while maintaining comprehensive coverage

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Each receive beam is designed to be multi-functional, detecting targets across multiple ranges and angles simultaneously, reducing the number of separate systems needed while maintaining comprehensive surveillance capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system offers a cost-effective and efficient means to detect high-speed targets, providing timely warnings with a low false alarm rate, enabling personnel to take cover from incoming threats, and estimating the impact location of rockets with sufficient accuracy.

Implementation Method 1

a radar, processing means and indication means wherein the radar has a transmitter, a receiver, and one or more antennas arranged to transmit a signal and to receive reflections of the signal from a region

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRadar: Radar

Implementation Method 2

the processor incorporates a Doppler filter arranged to reject received signals corresponding to a target outside of predetermined velocity limits

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDoppler effect: Doppler Effect

Data Source

PatentUS9097793B2System for the detection of incoming munitions
Publication Date: 2015.08.04 QINETIQ LTD
  • US9097793B2 patent drawing
  • US9097793B2 patent drawing
  • US9097793B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system for detecting munitions in flight comprises a radar transmitter, receiver, and associated antennas, wherein the antennas are oriented to include ground level coverage, and where a receive antenna is arranged to provide a plurality of receive beams. The system further incorporates a Doppler filter arranged to reject targets that have velocity profiles that do not match those expected of targets of interest. If a target of interest is detected then an indication is provided, preferably in the form of an audible alert, allowing those nearby time to take cover. The system provides a simple munitions detection capability that may operate in CW mode to allow rapid detection, and may also have means such as switchable FMCW, and elevation measurement to allow estimation of possible landing areas of the target.