Ground Support Assembly With Adjustable Jaw Locking for Tent Poles

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current ground support solutions for temporary structures like awnings and tents are either inadequate in adverse weather conditions, too complex, or not compatible with different support legs and poles, making them unsuitable for quick assembly and use.

Innovation Solution

A modular ground support assembly featuring a planar base member with a locking mechanism comprising jaw members and stop members, allowing for adjustable compatibility with various support legs and poles, along with a toothed rack system for secure locking and easy adjustment.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If basic support plates are used to simply provide support for the leg, then the structure is simple and easy to assemble, but the support plate can be lifted by strong winds or slide in wet conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesupport plate structureVSAvoidground support stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The ground support assembly is divided into distinct functional segments: a base member for ground contact, a central support portion for receiving the foot portion, and a locking mechanism with movable jaw members. This segmentation allows each component to perform its specific function optimally while maintaining overall simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The locking mechanism incorporates movable jaw members that can dynamically adjust between open and closed positions to accommodate different foot portion sizes and shapes. This dynamic capability enables the same base plate to reliably secure various support legs without requiring multiple specialized plates.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If support plates with apertures for pegs or ground screws are used to secure the foot of a support leg, then lateral support is improved, but the device becomes more complex and time-consuming to assemble

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelateral supportVSAvoidassembly time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The locking mechanism merges the functions of lateral support and vertical securing into a single integrated system. The movable jaw members provide lateral constraint through their enclos engagement, while the same mechanism secures the foot portion vertically, eliminating the need for separate pegs or ground screws.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The locking mechanism is designed to be self-securing through the interaction between the movable jaw members and the foot portion. Once the jaw members are positioned around the foot portion, they automatically engage and lock, providing both lateral support and vertical securing without requiring additional fastening operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Reliability

If pegs and guylines are used to provide lateral support, then support stability is improved, but repeated removal of the pegs causes substantial damage to the ground

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesupport stabilityVSAvoidground damage
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The base member serves as an intermediary between the support leg and the ground. Instead of inserting pegs directly into the ground, the base plate distributes the load over a larger surface area, reducing ground damage. The locking mechanism then provides the necessary lateral support through mechanical engagement rather than ground penetration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Ease of operation

If rollout awnings with motors or gear mechanisms are used to improve ease of use, then deployment ease is improved, but the overall weight and size significantly increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedeployment easeVSAvoidawning system weight
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The ground support assembly is designed to be easily deployed and secured through simple manual operations. The movable jaw members can be opened and closed by hand to accommodate different foot portions, and the locking mechanism engages automatically, eliminating the need for motors or complex gear mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

5Adaptability or versatility

If ground support plates are designed for specific support legs from particular brands, then compatibility with those specific legs is ensured, but additional ground support plates must be purchased for different brands or sizes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebrand-specific compatibilityVSAvoidnumber of ground support plates needed
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The ground support assembly is designed with universal compatibility through its adaptable locking mechanism. The movable jaw members can accommodate various foot portion dimensions and shapes from different support leg brands, allowing a single base plate design to serve multiple functions across different awning systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS20250092709A1Ground support assembly for temporary shelter support structures
Publication Date: 2025.03.20 PEGGY PEG INNOVATIVE SYST
  • US20250092709A1 patent drawing
  • US20250092709A1 patent drawing
  • US20250092709A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention provides for a ground support assembly for different pole structures, comprising: a substantially planar base member, extending between a first end portion and a second end portion along a longitudinal central axis and defining a top surface and a bottom surface, comprising a central support portion adapted to receive and support a predetermined range of different foot portions of different pole structures, and a locking mechanism, adapted to releasably secure a foot portion of the predetermined range of different foot portions of the pole structure, comprising a first jaw member and an axially opposing second jaw member, each one selectively slidably mounted to said top surface of said base member and adapted to move in a direction along said central longitudinal axis between a first position, moved towards and enclosingly engaging said central support portion in cooperation with the other one of said first and second jaw member, and a second position, moved away and enclosingly disengaged from said central support portion; wherein said second position is defined by a first and second stop member, each one operably coupled to said base member so as to stoppingly engage with a respective one of said first and second jaw member when moving from said first position towards said second position.