Ground Truth Generation for ML Quality Assessment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current manual ground truth generation for quality assessment of articles is time-intensive and not scalable, prone to human error and bias, and fails to control for article topics, leading to inaccurate quality classification.

Innovation Solution

A method and system for ground truth generation using topic clustering and semi-supervised learning, where recommended and non-recommended articles are clustered by topic, and a quality assessment machine learning model is trained using a balanced training set to predict article quality independently of topic relevance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual ground truth generation is used for quality assessment, then expert knowledge can be applied, but the process is time-intensive and not scalable

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequality assessment accuracyVSAvoidground truth generation speed
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates synthetic training data by copying and adapting existing high-quality articles. The system generates artificial low-quality versions of high-quality articles through controlled modifications, creating a scalable dataset without requiring manual expert assessment of every training example. This allows automated generation of large training sets while maintaining quality relationships.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses the high-quality articles themselves to generate the training data. By automatically creating synthetic low-quality versions through text modification algorithms, the high-quality corpus serves its own purpose of generating training examples, eliminating the need for separate manual annotation processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Ease of operation

If manual quality assessment is performed without topic control, then the process is simpler, but accuracy is reduced due to human error and bias

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveassessment process simplicityVSAvoidquality classification accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the quality assessment task into two independent components: topic classification and quality assessment. By first clustering articles by topic and then assessing quality within each topic cluster, the system eliminates topic-related bias and allows for more precise quality measurements without increasing operational complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Topic clustering serves as an intermediary step between raw article collection and quality assessment. This intermediate organization by topic controls for topic-related factors, allowing the quality assessment to focus purely on quality attributes without being confounded by topic differences, thereby improving measurement precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Quantity of substance

If large training sets are generated manually, then data quality can be ensured, but the time and resources required increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetraining set sizeVSAvoidtraining set generation time
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system generates large quantities of training data by copying high-quality articles and creating synthetic low-quality versions through automated text modification. This copying approach allows rapid generation of large training sets with consistent quality relationships, avoiding the time-consuming manual annotation process while maintaining data quality through controlled synthesis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary topic clustering and high-quality article selection before generating the training set. By pre-organizing the corpus and identifying high-quality examples in advance, the system streamlines the subsequent synthetic data generation process, reducing overall time investment while enabling large-scale training set creation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS10552498B2Ground truth generation for machine learning based quality assessment of corpora
Publication Date: 2020.02.04 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION
  • US10552498B2 patent drawing
  • US10552498B2 patent drawing
  • US10552498B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A mechanism is provided in a computing device configured with instructions executing on a processor of the computing device to implement a ground truth generation system for quality assessment scoring of articles in a corpus. The ground truth generation system receives recommendations of a set of recommended articles from subject matter experts. The ground truth generation system identifies a set of non-recommended articles. A topic clustering component within the ground truth generation system performs topic clustering on a combination of the set of recommended articles and the set of non-recommended articles to form a set of topic clusters containing recommended articles and non-recommended articles. The ground truth generation system identifies a first number of recommended articles and a second number of non-recommended articles in each of the set of topic clusters to form a quality assessment training set. The mechanism trains a quality assessment machine learning model using the quality assessment training set.