Group Driving Guidance Using Comparable Style Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Drivers with different styles can create stress and discomfort when attempting to match the driving behavior of surrounding vehicles, especially when the style is not readily apparent, and this issue persists even with autonomous vehicles that may not match the localized group driving style.

Innovation Solution

A system that determines driving styles based on vehicle inputs and wireless signals from surrounding vehicles, providing guidance to match or adjust behavior to align with comparable drivers, using processors and communication systems for data sharing and recommendation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If drivers attempt to match their instantaneous driving style to the apparent driving behavior of surrounding vehicles, then they can integrate better into the group, but this creates stress on the driver who is forced to drive more or less aggressively than they would prefer

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedriving style adaptationVSAvoiddriver comfort
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts the vehicle's driving behavior by transitioning between different driving styles (aggressive, moderate, cautious) based on real-time analysis of surrounding traffic patterns. The processor monitors wireless signals from other vehicles, determines the dominant driving style of the group, and automatically adjusts the subject vehicle's acceleration, braking, and lane-changing behavior to match the group norm, thereby resolving the contradiction between adaptability and driver comfort.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements continuous feedback by receiving wireless signals from surrounding vehicles, analyzing their driving behaviors, comparing them against predefined thresholds, and adjusting the subject vehicle's driving style accordingly. This closed-loop feedback mechanism enables the vehicle to automatically adapt to group driving patterns without requiring manual driver intervention, thus maintaining both adaptability and driver comfort.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Ease of operation

If a vehicle acts differently than those around it, then the driver's individual preferences are maintained, but this makes the driving experience difficult for other vehicles in the immediate vicinity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveindividual driver preferenceVSAvoidgroup integration
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables dynamic switching between individual preference mode and group integration mode. The processor analyzes the subject vehicle's current driving style against the detected group driving style and automatically adjusts parameters such as acceleration rate, braking intensity, and lane-changing frequency to match the group norm when integration is beneficial, while still allowing the driver to maintain individual preferences when appropriate.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes key driving parameters (acceleration, braking, steering) based on the detected driving style of surrounding vehicles. By adjusting these parameters dynamically, the vehicle can seamlessly integrate into different traffic groups while maintaining the ability to revert to individual driver preferences when needed, thus resolving the contradiction between individual preference and group integration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If autonomous vehicles do not match the localized group driving style, then they maintain their programmed behavior, but this creates inconsistency and potential stress in the traffic flow

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprogrammed behavior consistencyVSAvoidlocalized group matching
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The autonomous vehicle system implements dynamic adaptability by continuously monitoring the driving styles of surrounding vehicles through wireless communications and automatically adjusting its own driving behavior to match the localized group. The processor analyzes acceleration patterns, braking behaviors, and lane-changing frequencies of nearby vehicles and modifies the autonomous vehicle's control parameters accordingly, enabling seamless integration into human-driven traffic groups while maintaining programmed safety and efficiency constraints.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes operational parameters such as acceleration rate, deceleration rate, following distance, and lane-changing timing based on the detected driving style of the surrounding group. This parameter adaptation allows the autonomous vehicle to match human driving patterns and group behavior norms, resolving the contradiction between maintaining programmed behavior consistency and adapting to localized group driving styles.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS12503132B2Adaptive guidance for group vehicular travel
Publication Date: 2025.12.23 FORD GLOBAL TECH LLC
  • US12503132B2 patent drawing
  • US12503132B2 patent drawing
  • US12503132B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system determines at least one driving style, reflecting driving behavior for a driver of a vehicle and based on inputs from a plurality of vehicle systems. The system receives a plurality of wireless signals from elements within a wireless communication range, each signal indicating the behavior of one or more drivers of other vehicles within a predefined distance of the vehicle. Further, the system determines, based on the wireless signals, whether one or more drivers are exhibiting behavior comparable to the driver of the vehicle based on predefined comparison thresholds and, responsive to determining that one or more drivers are exhibiting comparable behavior, provides guidance as to how to maneuver the vehicle to reach the vehicles driven by the one or more drivers exhibiting comparable behavior.