Image-Based Group Fee Settlement for Unmanned Store Users

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing technologies struggle to settle fees for multiple users belonging to a group in a lump sum, as they often only recognize individual users and not the groups they belong to.

Innovation Solution

A fee management system that utilizes a management apparatus to track multiple users in a space using imaging technology, recognizing the group to which they belong, and allows settlement of fees for all users in the group through a settlement apparatus when any member of the group is present.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If individual user recognition is implemented using imaging technology, then user identification accuracy is improved, but the ability to recognize and settle fees for groups of users deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser identification accuracyVSAvoidgroup fee settlement capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system merges individual user recognition results by combining imaging data with position information to identify group relationships. Multiple individual recognitions are integrated to achieve group-level fee settlement, resolving the contradiction between individual accuracy and group capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The imaging system serves multiple functions: it identifies individual users for precise recognition and simultaneously detects group formations for collective fee settlement. This multi-functionality allows the same system to handle both individual and group scenarios without compromising either capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Measurement precision

If traditional individual-based fee settlement is used, then fee accuracy for each user is improved, but user convenience and settlement efficiency deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefee accuracyVSAvoidsettlement convenience
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically switches between individual and group fee settlement modes based on detected user positions and group formations. When users are identified as being in a group, the system automatically enables lump-sum settlement, providing convenience without sacrificing fee accuracy through conditional logic.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system automatically detects group formations and initiates group fee settlement without requiring manual user input. Users simply need to be in proximity to the settlement apparatus, and the system handles the rest by identifying groups and processing fees autonomously, greatly enhancing convenience.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Ease of operation

If group fee settlement is enabled, then user convenience is improved, but the complexity of the settlement system deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesettlement convenienceVSAvoidsettlement system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system introduces a management apparatus as an intermediary that handles the complex tasks of group identification, fee calculation, and settlement coordination. This intermediary absorbs the system complexity, allowing the settlement apparatus itself to remain relatively simple while still providing convenient group settlement functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Measurement precision

If multiple users are tracked individually, then fee tracking accuracy is improved, but processing time and system resource consumption deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefee tracking accuracyVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system merges fee tracking for multiple users into a single group fee calculation when group formation is detected. Instead of processing and settling fees for each user separately, the system combines them into one lump-sum settlement, significantly reducing processing time while maintaining accurate fee tracking through centralized calculation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS20260038275A1Information processing apparatus, information processing system, and recording medium
Publication Date: 2026.02.05 RICOH CO LTD
  • US20260038275A1 patent drawing
  • US20260038275A1 patent drawing
  • US20260038275A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An information processing apparatus includes circuitry configured to: obtain one or more images; identify a person captured in the one or more images; identify a group of multiple persons to which the person identified belongs, based on positions of the multiple persons in the one or more images; obtain information relating to a fee charged for an action of each of the multiple persons; and output, in response to detecting that the person belonging to the group is located at a predetermined position, the information relating to the fee with respect to the multiple persons belonging to the group.