Group Mobility Command for Wireless Handover Coordination

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current wireless communication systems face challenges in managing handover procedures for multiple User Equipments (UEs) moving together, leading to delays and failures due to the lack of efficient methods to deduce common mobility behaviors and handle mobility events separately for each UE.

Innovation Solution

The method involves grouping UEs with correlated mobility patterns to predict and prepare for handover events collectively, using a single mobility command for multiple UEs and leveraging mobility-related parameters like signal strength and geographical proximity to optimize handover procedures.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If individual mobility procedures are performed for each UE, then mobility decisions can be made based on specific UE conditions, but the number of signaling messages and processing load increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemobility decision accuracyVSAvoidsignaling overhead
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple individual mobility procedures into a single group mobility procedure. Instead of sending separate handover commands to each UE, the base station sends one mobility command to the entire UE group, which all UEs execute simultaneously. This merging approach maintains reliable mobility decisions while significantly reducing signaling overhead and processing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The mobility command is designed with universal applicability through the use of a group identifier that can be recognized by multiple UEs. The command structure allows a single message to serve multiple functions - it can be received and processed by any UE in the group without requiring UE-specific customization, thereby reducing the number of separate signaling messages needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Adaptability or versatility

If mobility procedures are handled separately for each UE, then individual UE conditions can be addressed, but handover delays and failures increase due to lack of coordination

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveUE-specific mobility adaptationVSAvoidhandover success rate
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The base station performs preliminary actions by determining a mobility command in advance based on the mobility state of at least one UE in the group. This preliminary determination allows the base station to prepare and execute handover procedures proactively, coordinating the mobility actions of multiple UEs before actual handover events occur, thereby reducing delays and failures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms where UEs report their mobility states to the base station, which then uses this information to determine appropriate mobility commands for the entire group. This feedback loop ensures that individual UE conditions are considered while maintaining coordinated group-wide handover actions, improving overall handover reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Ease of operation

If separate handover commands are sent to each UE, then each UE can be instructed individually, but the time required for handover procedures increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveindividual UE controlVSAvoidhandover procedure duration
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple individual handover commands into a single group mobility command. This unified command structure allows the base station to instruct multiple UEs simultaneously without requiring separate signaling messages for each UE, thereby significantly reducing the time required for handover procedures while maintaining individual UE control through the group identifier and member indexing mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

4Measurement precision

If mobility procedures are processed individually for each UE, then detailed UE-specific processing can be performed, but the base station becomes overloaded with processing tasks

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveUE mobility parameter accuracyVSAvoidbase station processing capacity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple individual mobility parameter processing tasks into a single group-level processing operation. Instead of the base station independently processing mobility parameters for each UE separately, the system processes mobility information at the group level, thereby reducing the total processing load on the base station while maintaining sufficient precision for mobility decisions through group representative parameters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentEP2880913B1Method and arrangement for mobility procedures
Publication Date: 2019.08.07 TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET LM ERICSSON (PUBL)
  • EP2880913B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2880913B1 patent drawingFigure 2~3
  • EP2880913B1 patent drawingFigure 4

AI summary

Cooperating nodes, and methods therein, for mobility procedures in a wireless communication system supporting UE groups. One of the cooperating nodes is a base station being associated with a UE group comprising UEs having correlated mobility related parameters. The method in the base station comprises receiving, from a first UE in the UE group, a mobility related parameter associated with the first UE. The method further comprises determining whether to initiate a mobility related procedure for a second UE in the UE group based on the received mobility related parameter; and further comprises initiating the mobility related procedure for the second UE when it is determined that the mobility related procedure is to be performed. Thereby, prediction and decisions related to mobility events, e.g. handover events, for the second UE or for the whole group may be performed e.g. before or without receiving any mobility information related to the second UE, thereby enabling early prediction and better preparation, which can lead to more robust mobility procedures.