Group Recommendation Service Item Selection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional group recommendation methods fail to accurately capture individual influences and group dynamics in service selections, leading to suboptimal recommendations.

Innovation Solution

A method that generates initial service scores by aggregating individual preferences, predicts group preferences based on historical data, and calculates weighted scores to provide personalized recommendations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional score aggregation techniques are used to combine user preferences, then the recommendation process is simple and fast, but the accuracy of group recommendation is insufficient because individual influences and group dynamics are not captured

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegroup recommendation accuracyVSAvoidrecommendation process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The recommendation process is segmented into distinct modules: an initial service score generation module that aggregates individual preferences, a group preference prediction module that analyzes historical data, and a weighted service score generation module that combines both. This segmentation allows each module to specialize in specific tasks, improving overall accuracy while maintaining manageable complexity through modular design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-calculating and storing group preference predictions based on historical service selection data before actual recommendations are needed. This pre-processing of historical data enables the system to quickly retrieve and apply learned group dynamics patterns during the recommendation phase, enhancing accuracy without adding real-time computational burden.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Measurement precision

If historical service selection data is analyzed to predict group preferences, then individual influences and group dynamics are captured, but the data processing requirement and computational load increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepreference prediction accuracyVSAvoidcomputational energy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

Historical data analysis and group preference prediction are performed in advance and stored for future use. The system pre-processes historical service selection data to extract group dynamics patterns and stores these predictions, eliminating the need for repeated heavy computational analysis during each recommendation request and reducing real-time energy consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates simplified copies or representations of complex historical data patterns in the form of pre-computed group preference predictions. Instead of re-analyzing raw historical data each time, the system uses these compressed predictive models that capture essential group dynamics, significantly reducing computational energy requirements while maintaining prediction accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Data Source

PatentUS10204370B2Group recommendation for selection of service items
Publication Date: 2019.02.12 TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET LM ERICSSON (PUBL)
  • US10204370B2 patent drawing
  • US10204370B2 patent drawing
  • US10204370B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure provides enhanced group recommendation for selection of a service item with respect to a service class, and communicates the enhanced group recommendation to a sub-group of service users. Initial service scores for service items in the service class are generated by aggregating individual service preferences of sub-group members with respect to the service class. Group preferences for service items in the service class are then predicted using statistic data on previous service selections of sub-group members with respect to the service class. The initial service scores are aggregated with the predicted group preferences to generate of weighted service scores with respect to service items in the service class. One of the service items in the service class that has the highest weighted score is the group recommendation is communicated to the sub-group members.