Manufacturing Equipment Diagnosis via Grouped Data Abnormality Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional manufacturing equipment diagnosis systems face challenges in predicting abnormalities and malfunctions, particularly when dealing with new issues and noise in data, and require extensive calculation and past knowledge, making them inefficient and unstable.

Innovation Solution

A manufacturing equipment diagnosis support system that collects and analyzes data from multiple similar apparatuses, grouping and comparing features to identify unusual phenomena without relying on extensive calculation or past knowledge, using data analysis range setting, grouping, feature extraction, and testing to detect abnormalities.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If data mining and big data analysis technologies are used to extract significant information from large amounts of data, then the ability to find regularity and predict abnormalities is improved, but the calculation processing time increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveabnormality detection accuracyVSAvoidcalculation processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the large dataset into multiple divided datasets based on time periods or conditions, then performs parallel calculation processing on each segment. This division allows the system to analyze data more efficiently without sacrificing detection accuracy, resolving the contradiction between thorough analysis and processing time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of analyzing all data equally, the patent applies partial action by focusing computational resources on specific divided datasets that are most likely to contain abnormality patterns. This selective approach reduces overall calculation time while maintaining the ability to detect significant abnormalities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

2Reliability

If conventional diagnosis systems rely on past knowledge and stored failure data to determine abnormalities, then detection accuracy for known issues is improved, but the system cannot cope with new abnormalities that have never occurred before

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection reliabilityVSAvoidadaptability to new abnormalities
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent inverts the conventional approach by not starting with past failure data, but rather by directly analyzing current operation data to detect deviations from normal patterns. This inversion allows the system to identify new abnormalities without relying on pre-stored knowledge of specific failure modes, thereby improving adaptability while maintaining reliability through statistical analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs self-service by automatically learning normal operation patterns from current data and independently identifying abnormalities without requiring external knowledge bases or pre-programmed failure scenarios. This enables the system to adapt to new equipment and abnormality types autonomously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Quantity of substance

If data analysis includes noise and unknown disturbance, then comprehensive data collection is improved, but the extraction of regularity becomes unstable

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata volumeVSAvoidregularity extraction stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and separates noise and unknown disturbances from the operation data through filtering and preprocessing steps before performing regularity analysis. By taking out these destabilizing elements, the system can maintain stability in pattern recognition while still utilizing comprehensive data for detection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes parameters such as analysis time periods, data sampling rates, and statistical thresholds to optimize the balance between utilizing comprehensive data and maintaining stable regularity extraction. By adjusting these parameters, the system can accommodate noise while preserving detection accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS10996662B2Manufacturing equipment diagnosis support system
Publication Date: 2021.05.04 TMEIC CORP
  • US10996662B2 patent drawing
  • US10996662B2 patent drawing
  • US10996662B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A manufacturing equipment diagnosis support system includes: a data collector which collects and records respective data in plural apparatuses to be monitored provided in manufacturing equipment; a data analysis device; and a display. The data analysis device includes: a data analysis range setting unit which sets an analysis range of data, by an item of data and time period; a data grouping unit which classifies the data into a category based on specification and use condition of the apparatus to be monitored, and a category based on a physical quantity which the data shows, to group the data; a feature extracting unit which extracts a feature in each of the data items; an unusual phenomenon specifying unit which specifies an unusual phenomenon candidate item; and a testing unit which tests whether there is a significant difference or not between the unusual phenomenon candidate item and an other data item.