Grouped Node Iteration for Junction Pressure Calculation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Distributed simulation systems for process networks face challenges in accurately and efficiently calculating pressure and flow variables, especially at junction nodes where flow converges or diverges, leading to potential inaccuracies and computational inefficiencies due to the need for centralized coordination and handling of matrix singularities.

Innovation Solution

A method using a grouped node identification technique to solve for pressures at junction nodes, employing a grouped node iteration and flow-based pressure calibration to ensure accurate real-time pressure and flow variable determination, eliminating the need for a central coordinator and improving computational efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If a centralized coordination approach is used to calculate pressure and flow variables in distributed simulation systems, then measurement precision and reliability are improved, but device complexity and computational efficiency deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepressure and flow variable accuracyVSAvoidcentralized coordination structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the calculation process by identifying grouped nodes (junction nodes and their directly connected nodes) as independent calculation units. Each grouped node set performs pressure and flow calculations locally using its own mass balance equations, eliminating the need for centralized coordination while maintaining accuracy through localized mass conservation enforcement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transforms the calculation approach by organizing nodes into grouped sets based on spatial topology (junction nodes and their connections) rather than using a centralized hierarchical structure. This dimensional reorganization allows parallel independent calculations at each grouped node while preserving the physical relationships through mass balance constraints.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Ease of operation

If traditional sequential methods are used to solve pressure and flow equations, then ease of operation is improved, but productivity and computational efficiency worsen due to matrix singularities and iterative convergence issues

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecalculation method simplicityVSAvoidcomputational efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary identification and grouping of nodes into junction nodes and their directly connected nodes before calculation. This pre-organization into calculation sets enables direct application of mass balance equations to each group without encountering matrix singularity issues, eliminating the need for iterative convergence procedures and improving computational speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies the same mass balance calculation methodology to each grouped node set independently, copying the calculation procedure across multiple node groups. This standardized approach maintains simplicity while achieving parallel execution and improved productivity through elimination of iterative convergence requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Productivity

If distributed calculation without centralized coordination is implemented, then productivity and computational efficiency are improved, but measurement precision and reliability worsen due to potential flow imbalance at junction nodes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomputational efficiencyVSAvoidflow balance accuracy at junction nodes
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the calculation of pressure and flow variables into a unified mass balance equation for each grouped node set. By combining these calculations and solving them simultaneously using the identified node groupings, the method ensures flow balance accuracy at junction nodes while maintaining distributed independent calculation efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback through the mass balance equations that enforce flow conservation at each junction node. The calculated flow variables are fed back into the mass balance constraints to verify and adjust pressure and flow values, ensuring accuracy while maintaining the distributed calculation structure without centralized coordination.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS9052703B2Enhanced sequential method for solving pressure/flow network parameters in a real-time distributed industrial process simulation system
Publication Date: 2015.06.09 EMERSON PROCESS MANAGEMENT POWER & WATER SOLUTIONS INC
  • US9052703B2 patent drawing
  • US9052703B2 patent drawing
  • US9052703B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A pressure and flow calculation technique can be used in a distributed process network simulation system that uses the sequential solving method to perform better or faster simulations of a process flow, especially with respect to process junction nodes at which flow either converges or diverges. The pressure and flow variable determination technique uses a grouped node identification technique that identifies a local set of nodes for each junction node of the process network to use when solving for the pressure at the junction node, a grouped node iteration technique that uses the grouped set of nodes at each junction node to perform iterative pressure calculations at the junction node, and a flow-based pressure calibration technique at each junction node to enable the system to perform highly accurate pressure and flow variable determination at each junction node in real-time.