Group-Wise STBICM MIMO Receiver Demapping

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing MIMO receivers face high computational complexity in demapping processes, making them impractical for high spectral efficiency systems due to exponential complexity in processing multiple symbol streams, especially when the number of receive elements is less than the number of transmitted streams.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a demapper that operates on a group-wise basis, using single stream demappers and group stream demappers to reduce complexity by assigning streams into groups for independent demapping, with soft cancellation and spatial filtering to minimize interference, allowing for adjustable complexity based on receiver processing power.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If joint-stream demapping is used to process multiple symbol streams simultaneously, then decoding performance is improved, but computational complexity increases exponentially

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedecoding performanceVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the set of Nt symbol streams into multiple groups, where each group contains a subset of streams. Instead of processing all streams simultaneously (joint-stream demapping), the system processes each group independently using group stream demappers. This segmentation reduces the computational complexity from exponential to manageable levels while maintaining decoding performance through iterative processing across multiple groups.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Device complexity

If the number of receive elements is reduced to match the number of transmitted streams, then system complexity is reduced, but interference between streams increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem complexityVSAvoidinterference between streams
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements an iterative detection process where soft information is exchanged between group stream demappers and a channel decoder across multiple iterations. In each iteration, the demappers use feedback information from previous iterations to refine their estimates, progressively reducing interference effects. This feedback mechanism allows the system to compensate for the reduced number of receive elements while maintaining acceptable performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Device complexity

If group stream demapping is implemented with multiple groups, then computational complexity is reduced, but processing time increases due to iterative operations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomputational complexityVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs a dynamic iterative process where the number of iterations and the grouping configuration can be adjusted based on system conditions. The iterative detection allows the system to converge on optimal decisions progressively, balancing processing time and complexity. In practical implementations, the number of iterations is limited to achieve sufficient performance improvement within acceptable time constraints.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS7593489B2Iterative STBICM MIMO receiver using group-wise demapping
Publication Date: 2009.09.22 NYTELL SOFTWARE LLC
  • US7593489B2 patent drawing
  • US7593489B2 patent drawing
  • US7593489B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A STBICM MIMO receiver includes a plurality of demappers for demapping a plurality of complex symbols transmitted by a STBICM MIMO transmitter. Each demapper is configured to have one or more complex symbols associated therewith and is responsible for demapping its associated complex symbols.