Growth-Based Design for Automated Mechanical Part Optimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing CAD tools require manual design creation and iterative testing, limiting the ability to automatically update designs based on simulation results and restricting the generation of self-optimized mechanical part geometries.

Innovation Solution

The growth-based design approach uses programmable cellular building blocks that automatically adapt and grow in response to simulations, allowing for the generation of naturally optimized mechanical part designs without manual intervention.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Extent of automation

If manual design creation and iterative testing are used in existing CAD tools, then design control and precision are maintained, but design automation and optimization capability are limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedesign automationVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables self-service by allowing the mechanical part to automatically generate its own optimized geometry through simulated growth processes. The part iteratively adapts its structure in response to applied loads and constraints without requiring manual intervention, effectively designing itself based on functional requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The design process transitions from static manual modeling to dynamic automated evolution. The mechanical part's geometry dynamically changes through iterative simulation cycles where the structure grows and adapts in real-time response to testing stimuli, enabling continuous optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Manufacturing precision

If traditional CAD tools require users to create geometry explicitly, then design intent is clearly defined, but automatic optimization based on simulation results is prevented

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedesign precisionVSAvoiddesign efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-defining the design space boundaries, material properties, and loading conditions before the actual design process begins. This allows the automated growth algorithm to operate within constrained parameters, ensuring design precision while maintaining efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements continuous feedback loops where simulation results from stress analysis and performance testing automatically feed back into the design process. The mechanical part uses this feedback to iteratively adjust its geometry, removing material from low-stress areas and reinforcing high-stress regions, thereby achieving automatic optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If iterative testing and manual modification are performed, then design validation is thorough, but time consumption increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedesign validationVSAvoiddesign time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system maintains continuity of useful action by eliminating idle time between design and testing phases. The automated growth process continuously evolves the mechanical part geometry based on real-time simulation feedback, ensuring that every iteration builds upon previous results without manual intervention delays.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces the mechanical process of manual design modification with an automated computational algorithm. The growth-based design algorithm automatically interprets simulation results and modifies geometry accordingly, substituting human manual operations with automated mechanical-computational processes that are both thorough and time-efficient.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS11281820B2Systems and methods for growth-based design
Publication Date: 2022.03.22 DESKTOP METAL INC
  • US11281820B2 patent drawing
  • US11281820B2 patent drawing
  • US11281820B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods are disclosed for generating designs for mechanical parts in a computer aided design (CAD) context. One method includes generating a model of a mechanical part, the model including one or more cells, wherein each cell is comprised of a plurality of parameterized representations, each of the plurality of parameterized representations representing a material property; determining, for each cell, a cell-specific parameter value for each of the parameterized representations; comparing, for each cell, each of the cell-specific parameter values to a corresponding threshold parameter value associated with each of the representations of the material properties; and generating at least one additional cell or removing at least one of the one or more cells based on the comparison of each cell-specific parameter value to the corresponding threshold parameter value.