Guard Assembly for Countersink Tool Safety

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current countersink tools pose safety risks to operators due to finger contact with blades during tool changes and generate hazardous dust and debris, requiring frequent inspection and adjustment for precise control of hole depth.

Innovation Solution

A guard assembly with a cylindrical body and inner passage that includes slots for easy attachment and detachment, air flow openings for visibility, and a suction passage for dust removal, coupled with a vacuum system to enhance safety and cleanliness.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If large cutouts are provided in countersink tools to allow operator access to change blades, then ease of operation is improved, but operator safety deteriorates due to risk of finger contact with the blade

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccess to cutterVSAvoidoperator safety
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The guard assembly is divided into multiple sections including a main body portion and a movable guard portion that can be independently positioned. This segmentation allows the guard to provide protection while still permitting operator access to the cutter when needed, resolving the contradiction between safety and ease of operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The guard assembly acts as an intermediary barrier between the operator and the cutter blade. It provides physical protection against accidental contact while including features like openings and movable portions that allow necessary access and visibility, thus mediating between safety requirements and operational needs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If the countersinking tool generates dust, chips, and splinters during operation, then productivity is maintained, but harmful factors increase due to ejection of debris

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecountersinking operationVSAvoiddust and chips
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The guard assembly captures the harmful dust, chips, and splinters generated during countersinking and redirects them through designated pathways away from the operator. By containing and channeling the debris rather than allowing random ejection, the harmful byproducts of the countersinking operation are converted into a controlled flow that maintains productivity while reducing hazards.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

3Manufacturing precision

If frequent inspection and adjustment are required to achieve precise countersink depth, then manufacturing precision is improved, but loss of time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecountersink depthVSAvoidinspection and adjustment time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The guard assembly includes pre-configured depth indicators and reference features that are established during manufacturing. These preliminary markings allow operators to quickly verify depth settings without extensive measurement and adjustment, reducing the time required for precision control while maintaining accurate countersink depth.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The guard assembly provides operator safety by preventing finger contact with blades and efficient cleanup through air flow and suction, maintaining tool functionality and precision without altering the countersinking process.

Implementation Method 1

The body further includes a suction passage proximate the second end and a suction port that is in fluid communication with the suction passage. The suction port is configured and arranged to be coupled to a vacuum system.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSuction: Suction

Implementation Method 2

The body further includes at least one opening proximate the second end to allow air flow.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAir flow:

Data Source

PatentUS9221142B2Guard assembly
Publication Date: 2015.12.29 NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORP
  • US9221142B2 patent drawing
  • US9221142B2 patent drawing
  • US9221142B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A guard assembly for a tool is provided. The guard assembly has a body with a first open end, a second open end and a mid-portion between the first open end and the second open end. The body forms an inner passage between the first open end and the second open end. The passage is configured to receive a portion of a tool. The body has a plurality of spaced slots. Each slot extends from the first open end a select distance toward the mid-portion of the body. The body has a port and a plurality of openings proximate the second open end to allow air or fluid passage.