Guard Band Controller for Dynamic Hardware Resource Optimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Computing devices face inefficiencies in power management due to conservative guard bands, leading to excessive energy consumption and performance losses, especially when handling computationally intensive tasks, as existing methods struggle to dynamically adapt to varying workloads and voltage droops.

Innovation Solution

A guard band controller that utilizes machine learning and artificial intelligence to dynamically adjust the safety margins of hardware resources based on workload phases, predicting optimal guard bands and implementing a fast-reactive voltage droop mitigation loop to maintain high reliability and reduce power consumption.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conservative guard bands are used to ensure system reliability, then voltage droop mitigation is improved, but power consumption increases and computing performance decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem reliabilityVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by transitioning from static guard bands to dynamic guard bands that adapt in real-time based on workload characteristics. The system continuously monitors workload phase and adjusts guard band values dynamically, allowing the system to maintain reliability when needed while reducing power consumption during workloads that tolerate voltage droop, thereby resolving the contradiction between reliability and energy efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameter of guard band voltage from fixed conservative values to variable values based on workload analysis. By adjusting the guard band parameter dynamically according to workload phase and type, the system optimizes the balance between reliability (maintaining sufficient guard bands when necessary) and power consumption (reducing guard bands when workloads can tolerate voltage variations), thus resolving the technical contradiction

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If conservative guard bands are used to ensure system reliability, then voltage droop mitigation is improved, but computing performance decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem reliabilityVSAvoidcomputing performance
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts guard bands based on real-time workload monitoring, enabling high computing performance during workloads that are tolerant of voltage droop while maintaining system reliability during critical operations. This dynamic adaptation resolves the contradiction by making guard bands flexible rather than uniformly conservative

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the guard band parameter from fixed conservative values to workload-dependent variable values. By analyzing workload phase and adjusting the guard band parameter accordingly, the system achieves high computing performance when voltage droop is acceptable while maintaining reliability when needed, thus resolving the contradiction between reliability and productivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Use of energy by moving object

If dynamic guard band adjustment is implemented, then power efficiency is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms that monitor workload phase and system state, using this information to dynamically adjust guard bands. The feedback loop enables the system to optimize power efficiency through adaptive guard band adjustment while managing complexity through structured monitoring and control algorithms that analyze workload characteristics and translate them into appropriate guard band settings

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Reliability

If conservative operating setpoints are used, then system reliability is improved, but energy expenditure increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem reliabilityVSAvoidenergy expenditure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transitions from static conservative operating setpoints to dynamic setpoints that adapt based on workload phase. By continuously adjusting operating parameters according to real-time workload characteristics, the system maintains reliability during critical operations while reducing energy expenditure during workloads that can tolerate more aggressive settings, thus resolving the contradiction between reliability and energy loss

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS12130688B2Methods and apparatus to optimize a guard band of a hardware resource
Publication Date: 2024.10.29 INTEL CORP
  • US12130688B2 patent drawing
  • US12130688B2 patent drawing
  • US12130688B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods, apparatus, systems and articles of manufacture are disclosed to optimize a guard band of a hardware resource. An example apparatus includes at least one storage device, and at least one processor to execute instructions to identify a phase of a workload based on an output from a machine-learning model, the phase based on a utilization of one or more hardware resources, and based on the phase, control a guard band of a first hardware resource of the one or more hardware resources.