Guard Interval Adaptation for Wireless Communication Overhead

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current wireless communication systems lack flexibility and adaptability, particularly in managing guard intervals, which affects their ability to efficiently switch between transmission and reception modes and leads to excessive overhead in guard periods, especially in future developments beyond the LTE standard.

Innovation Solution

Adapting the guard interval length in wireless communication systems by varying the cyclic prefix or guard period length based on operational conditions, allowing for more granular control and reducing unnecessary overhead, while maintaining constant symbol time length, through methods such as changing IFFT size, chip rate, or interpolation ratio.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If the guard interval length is fixed in current wireless communication systems, then the system structure is simple and easy to implement, but the system lacks flexibility and adaptability in managing guard intervals, affecting the ability to efficiently switch between transmission and reception modes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflexibility and adaptability in managing guard intervalsVSAvoidsystem structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by making the guard interval length adjustable rather than fixed. The system dynamically adapts the guard interval duration based on operational conditions, allowing efficient switching between transmission and reception modes. This is achieved through configurable parameters that enable the guard interval to be optimized for different scenarios while maintaining system simplicity through standardized adaptation mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameter of guard interval length from a fixed value to a variable parameter that can be adapted based on operational needs. By allowing the guard interval duration to be modified according to different transmission and reception requirements, the system achieves greater flexibility without fundamentally altering its core structure, thus resolving the contradiction between adaptability and complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If the guard interval length is increased to ensure proper switching between transmission and reception, then the reliability of mode switching is improved, but the overhead in guard periods increases excessively

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereliability of switching between transmission and receptionVSAvoidoverhead in guard periods
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses dynamic adaptation of guard interval length to ensure reliable mode switching only when necessary. Instead of using a uniformly long guard interval, the system adjusts the duration dynamically based on actual operational conditions, providing sufficient switching time when needed while minimizing overhead during normal operation. This resolves the contradiction by making the guard interval length variable rather than consistently maximum.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the guard interval parameter from a fixed conservative value to an adaptive parameter that adjusts based on operational requirements. By modifying the guard interval duration according to actual switching needs, the system maintains reliability for mode transitions while reducing excessive overhead, achieving optimal balance between these two competing requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Adaptability or versatility

If the guard interval is extended to accommodate future developments beyond LTE standard, then the system can handle more complex communication scenarios, but the resource utilization efficiency decreases due to unnecessary muted intervals

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to handle future communication scenariosVSAvoidresource utilization efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by implementing configurable and adaptable guard interval mechanisms that can evolve with future communication requirements. The system can extend guard intervals when needed for complex scenarios while maintaining efficient resource utilization during normal operation. This dynamic adaptability allows the system to prepare for future developments without permanently sacrificing current resource efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent enables parameter changes in guard interval configuration to accommodate future standards and scenarios. By making the guard interval duration a flexible parameter rather than a fixed constraint, the system can be optimized for different operational modes and future requirements, preventing resource waste while maintaining the capability to handle more complex communication scenarios when necessary.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS10498576B2Guard interval adaptation for wireless communication
Publication Date: 2019.12.03 TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET LM ERICSSON (PUBL)
  • US10498576B2 patent drawing
  • US10498576B2 patent drawing
  • US10498576B2 patent drawing

AI summary

There is disclose a method for operating a wireless device in a wireless communication network, wherein the wireless device is configured to communicate utilizing signals in the form of symbols having a pre-determined symbol time length, the method comprising adapting a guarding time length of a guard interval in a symbol. In addition, related methods and devices are discussed.