Self-sulfiding Guard Reactor Catalyst for Tar Conversion

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current hydroprocessing methods for pyrolysis tars are energy-intensive, material-intensive, and time-consuming, with discontinuous sulfiding processes leading to inefficient production of hydroconverted products and increased reactor fouling.

Innovation Solution

A method involving thermal treatment of pyrolysis tar to reduce reactivity, blending with a utility fluid to create a lower viscosity stream, and hydroprocessing in a guard reactor without prior sulfiding of catalysts, under mild conditions, which activates catalysts using sulfur-containing compounds from the tar itself.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a conventional sulfiding process is performed before hydroprocessing, then catalyst activity is improved, but processing time and energy consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecatalyst activityVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs thermal treatment of the pyrolysis tar feedstock before hydroprocessing to pre-activate the catalyst and reduce fouling potential. This preliminary action prepares the feedstock in advance, allowing the hydroprocessing to proceed more efficiently without requiring extended sulfiding time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent eliminates the discontinuous sulfiding process by integrating catalyst activation directly into the hydroprocessing operation. The catalyst is activated in-situ during the hydroprocessing stage itself, allowing continuous operation without separate sulfiding and cleaning phases, thereby reducing total processing time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

2Reliability

If a conventional sulfiding process is performed before hydroprocessing, then catalyst activation is improved, but energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecatalyst activationVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines the catalyst activation function with the hydroprocessing operation. The thermal treatment and hydroprocessing stages are integrated such that catalyst activation occurs simultaneously with or immediately before hydroprocessing begins, eliminating the need for separate energy-intensive sulfiding operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The pyrolysis tar feedstock itself serves as the sulfur source for catalyst activation during hydroprocessing. The sulfur-containing compounds naturally present in the tar activate the catalyst in-situ, eliminating the need for external sulfiding agents and the energy required to deliver and remove them.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Object-affected harmful factors

If thermal treatment is applied to reduce tar reactivity, then reactor fouling is reduced, but processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereactor foulingVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies thermal treatment at controlled temperatures to modify the chemical parameters of the pyrolysis tar, specifically reducing the reactivity of unsaturated hydrocarbons and radicals. This parameter change decreases fouling tendency while maintaining process efficiency through optimized treatment conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach reduces energy consumption, material use, and processing time while maintaining or improving reactor fouling resistance, enabling efficient production of low-sulfur fuel oil and other hydroprocessing products.

Implementation Method 1

The hydroprocessing catalysts can include transition metals and the catalysts are sulfided by a sulfiding process to activate the catalyst(s) into an active form and to promote hydroprocessing of the pyrolysis tar upon contact with the sulfided catalyst(s)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCatalysis: Catalysis

Implementation Method 2

A sulfiding process typically includes flowing a catalyst activator, such as a sulfur-containing compound (such as dimethyldisulfide (DMDS)), from an activator source into each of the hydroprocessing reactors

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSulfiding:

Implementation Method 3

Pyrolysis processes, such as steam cracking, are utilized for converting saturated hydrocarbons to higher-value products such as light olefins, e.g., ethylene and propylene

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeating: Heating

Data Source

PatentUS11236276B2Self-sulfiding of guard reactor catalyst for solvent assisted tar conversion processes
Publication Date: 2022.02.01 EXXONMOBIL CHEMICAL PATENTS INC
  • US11236276B2 patent drawing
  • US11236276B2 patent drawing
  • US11236276B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure provides methods for hydroprocessing of heavy oils, such as pyrolysis tars. For example, a process for preparing a liquid hydrocarbon product includes providing a first process stream comprising a reduced reactivity tar, and blending the first process stream with a utility fluid to produce a second process stream comprising solids and a reduced reactivity, lower viscosity tar. The method can includes introducing the second process stream into a guard reactor without sulfiding the guard reactor catalyst(s) prior to introducing the second process stream into the guard reactor. The method includes hydroprocessing the second process stream in the guard reactor under mild hydroprocessing conditions to produce a third process stream. The method includes hydroprocessing the third process stream to produce a fourth process stream having a bromine number (BN) lower than 12 and comprising the liquid hydrocarbon product and the utility fluid.