Guard Tour Path Deviation Detection via Sensor Segmentation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current security monitoring systems lack effective methods to ensure guards follow predetermined tour paths at monitored properties, leading to potential security breaches and inefficiencies in monitoring.

Innovation Solution

An integrated security environment with sensors and a control unit that monitors activity patterns, provides a guard tour path with checkpoints, and notifies owners and guards of deviations, allowing for real-time adjustments and updates to the tour path based on sensor data and unusual activity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If guards manually patrol properties without automated monitoring, then operational flexibility is maintained, but security reliability deteriorates due to inability to verify guard compliance with tour paths

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity monitoring reliabilityVSAvoidmonitoring system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The monitoring system is segmented into distributed sensors placed at key locations throughout the property, each independently detecting guard presence. These segmented sensing points collectively verify compliance with the guard tour path without requiring a complex centralized monitoring infrastructure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback by having sensors detect guard presence at checkpoints and automatically notify the monitoring system. This feedback mechanism provides real-time verification of guard compliance, significantly improving security monitoring reliability without proportionally increasing system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If automated sensor monitoring is implemented to track guard movements, then security monitoring reliability improves, but loss of time increases due to data processing requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveguard tour verification reliabilityVSAvoidtime for detecting and responding to deviations
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

Guard tour paths and checkpoints are pre-configured in the system before guard deployment. Sensors are pre-positioned at critical locations, and alert notification channels are pre-established. This preliminary setup enables immediate detection and notification when guards deviate from their paths, minimizing response time while maintaining high verification reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If real-time guard tracking is implemented, then security reliability improves, but device complexity increases due to integration of multiple sensors and control units

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereal-time monitoring reliabilityVSAvoidintegrated security system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The sensor nodes are designed as multi-functional units that can detect guard presence, identify location, and trigger alerts simultaneously. This universal functionality reduces the need for separate specialized devices, thereby improving real-time monitoring reliability while limiting the increase in overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Reliability

If checkpoints are mandated along guard paths, then security reliability improves through verified coverage, but ease of operation deteriorates due to rigid path constraints

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproperty coverage reliabilityVSAvoidguard tour flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The guard tour path system is designed to be dynamic rather than static. While checkpoints are mandated for reliability, the system can adapt paths in real-time based on detected conditions, unexpected events, or varying security priorities. This dynamic approach ensures verified property coverage through checkpoints while maintaining operational flexibility for guards.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS11941569B2Entity path tracking and automation
Publication Date: 2024.03.26 ALARM COM INC
  • US11941569B2 patent drawing
  • US11941569B2 patent drawing
  • US11941569B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and techniques are described for tracking guard tours. In some implementations, the techniques include the actions of receiving data indicating an initiation of a guard tour at the property and by a user, where the guard tour defines a path that includes one or more checkpoints with which the user is instructed to interact. The actions further include analyzing the sensor data. The actions further include determining a location of the user conducting the guard tour at the property. The actions further include based on the location of the user and the path of the guard tour, determining that the user is not following the path of the guard tour. The actions further include based on determining that the user is not following the path of the guard tour, providing, for output, data indicating that the user is not following the path of the guard tour.