Guardrail Post Footing Hinge Design for Inclined Surfaces

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing post mounting footings for guardrails do not allow for sufficient hinging flexibility and safety features, particularly when used on inclined surfaces, as they typically restrict movement to less than 90 degrees, leading to potential buckling or breakage under load and lack of accidental pivoting prevention.

Innovation Solution

A post mounting footing design featuring a lower and upper part that are hinge-mounted, with a slot and tongue mechanism allowing re-orientation between a locked and unlocked position, enabling hinging through more than 90 degrees and incorporating a locking element to secure the parts, ensuring safety and stability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the hinging angle is increased to greater than 90 degrees, then the safety and structural integrity is improved, but the device complexity increases due to the slot and tongue mechanism

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety and structural integrityVSAvoidhinge mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The hinge mechanism is divided into separate functional components: a slot formed in the footing and a tongue portion on the post mounting assembly. This segmentation allows the angle adjustment function to be achieved through the interaction of simple geometric features rather than a complex mechanical hinge, enabling greater than 90-degree hinging while maintaining structural integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The solution moves from a conventional single-plane hinge to a two-dimensional adjustment mechanism using a slot-tongue interface. The slot extends in a first direction allowing angular adjustment, while the tongue provides a second degree of freedom through its engagement geometry, enabling greater than 90-degree hinging without increasing mechanical complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Reliability

If the locking element is added to prevent accidental pivoting, then the safety is improved, but the ease of operation deteriorates due to the additional locking step

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety against accidental pivotingVSAvoidoperation simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The locking element is designed to be manually operable by the user without requiring additional tools or complex mechanisms. The user can directly engage or disengage the locking element to secure or adjust the hinging angle, providing safety against accidental pivoting while maintaining ease of operation through simple manual interaction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Adaptability or versatility

If the slot extends completely across the width of the tongue portion, then the hinging flexibility is improved, but the manufacturing precision requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehinging flexibilityVSAvoidslot and tongue alignment precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The complete width extension of the slot across the tongue portion is achieved through segmented manufacturing of the footing and post mounting assembly. By forming the slot in one component and providing the tongue portion on another, the design allows for flexible hinging motion while distributing manufacturing tolerances across separate parts rather than requiring high precision in a single monolithic structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentEP2459820B1Post mounting footing
Publication Date: 2017.11.08 LATCHWAYS PLC (GB)
  • EP2459820B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP2459820B1 patent drawingFigure 3~5
  • EP2459820B1 patent drawingFigure 6~8

AI summary

A post mounting footing, for example, for a support post of a guardrail system, having a lower part and an upper part, hinge mounted with respect to the lower part. The upper and lower parts are configured to be re-orientatable between a first position in which hinge operation is inhibited and a second position in which clearance between the upper and lower parts is enabled so as to permit hinging.