EV Charging Control Using GUI Scheduling and Load Balancing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Electric vehicle charging requires significant time and adherence to schedules, leading to vehicle unavailability and resistance in charging and uncharging processes, with existing systems lacking efficient load balancing and intelligent charging solutions.

Innovation Solution

An intelligent electric vehicle charging system that uses vehicle sensors and communication devices to determine charging schedules, manage power distribution, and balance electrical loads by selecting optimal power sources, including vehicle-generated energy, to minimize costs and optimize charging times.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If electric vehicles are charged regularly to maintain electrical charge, then the vehicle remains operational, but the vehicle becomes unavailable for protracted stretches of time and requires user intervention

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevehicle operational statusVSAvoidvehicle unavailability time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The charging system automatically determines when and how to charge vehicles without user intervention. The system monitors vehicle charge levels, identifies available power sources, and executes charging operations autonomously, allowing vehicles to service their own charging needs while parked.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system proactively charges vehicles before they are needed, using available power sources including other vehicles in the parking lot. By anticipating charging needs and executing charges in advance, the system ensures vehicle availability without requiring users to plan charging schedules.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Ease of operation

If users manually plug in and unplug vehicles for charging, then charging can be controlled, but user resistance increases due to inconvenience

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecharging operation convenienceVSAvoiduser resistance to charging
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The charging system operates completely autonomously without requiring user action. Vehicles are charged automatically through wireless power transfer while parked, eliminating the need for users to physically connect or disconnect charging equipment, thereby removing the source of user resistance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces manual mechanical plug-and-play charging with automated wireless power transfer. Electromagnetic fields enable energy transfer without physical connection, substituting the mechanical interaction that caused user inconvenience with a contactless automated process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Loss of time

If charging infrastructure is expanded to reduce charging time, then vehicle availability improves, but system complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecharging time durationVSAvoidcharging system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Vehicles serve dual functions as both power consumers and power sources. Each vehicle can draw power when needed and supply power to others when charged, creating a multi-functional system where the same assets perform multiple roles, reducing the need for additional dedicated charging infrastructure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system merges the charging infrastructure with the vehicle fleet itself. Rather than building separate charging stations, the vehicles are combined into a mutual charging network where power is exchanged between vehicles, simplifying the overall system architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

4Productivity

If traditional charging methods are used, then charging can be performed, but load balancing and cost optimization are insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecharging efficiencyVSAvoidenergy cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system continuously monitors power availability, vehicle charge levels, and energy costs to dynamically adjust charging decisions. Feedback loops enable the system to identify optimal charging opportunities, balance loads across the fleet, and minimize energy costs by charging when power is abundant and inexpensive.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The charging system dynamically adapts to changing conditions including power source availability, vehicle needs, and energy prices. Rather than following fixed schedules, the system flexibly adjusts charging operations in real-time to optimize efficiency and cost-effectiveness based on current system state.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS11990788B2Systems and methods for graphical user interface (GUI)-based charging of electric vehicles
Publication Date: 2024.05.21 CHARGE FUSION TECHNOLOGIES LLC
  • US11990788B2 patent drawing
  • US11990788B2 patent drawing
  • US11990788B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for charging electric vehicles utilizing Graphical User Interface (GUI) elements.