Context-Aware GUI Mode Switching for Battery-Saving Device Interaction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Electronic devices with touch-sensitive surfaces often waste battery power when not in use, as they remain active and provide unnecessary functionality, leading to reduced battery life and inefficient user interaction.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a method that dynamically adjusts the user interface based on specific criteria, such as device orientation and charging status, to display customizable interfaces only when necessary, thereby reducing power consumption and enhancing user interaction efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If the device remains active and provides full functionality when not in use, then user access to functions and information is maintained, but battery power is wasted unnecessarily

Engineering Contradiction:

Improveuser access to functionsVSAvoidbattery power consumption

Core Design Contradiction:

Ease of operationVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts its operational state based on detected criteria such as device orientation and charging status. When the device is in a docked orientation and charging, it transitions to a different mode that provides enhanced functionality. This dynamic adaptation allows the device to be more accessible when power is available, while conserving battery when portable

Inventive Principle:

Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes operational parameters based on detected conditions. When specific criteria are met (device orientation, charging state), the system transitions between different operational modes with different functionality levels. This parameter change allows the device to optimize between accessibility and power consumption based on environmental context

Inventive Principle:

Principle #35Parameter changes

2Adaptability or versatility

If the device provides full functionality at all times, then user interaction capabilities are maximized, but power consumption increases and battery life decreases

Engineering Contradiction:

Improvedevice functionalityVSAvoidbattery life

Core Design Contradiction:

Adaptability or versatilityVSDuration of action of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements periodic detection of criteria (device orientation, charging status) and transitions between operational modes based on these periodic assessments. This allows the device to maintain full functionality when conditions permit while conserving battery life during periods when conditions do not support enhanced operation

Inventive Principle:

Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The system automatically detects environmental criteria and self-adjusts its operational mode without requiring user intervention. The device monitors its own state (charging status, orientation) and autonomously transitions between modes, enabling it to serve itself in optimizing the balance between functionality and battery life

Inventive Principle:

Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS20240406304A1Devices, Methods, and Graphical User Interfaces for Activating, Configuring, and Interacting with Different Operational Modes

Publication Date: 2024.12.05 APPLE INC

AI summary

A computer system detects a first event. In response to detecting the first event: if first criteria are met as a result of the first event, wherein the first criteria require that the orientation of the display generation component is a first orientation, and that the computer system is charging, in order for the first criteria to be met, the computer system displays a first customizable user interface that was not displayed prior to detecting the first event; and, if the first criteria are not met as a result of the first event, the computer system forgoes displaying the first customizable user interface.