Graphical User Interface for Modifiable Entity Object Display

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing digital object origination processes often discourage users from obtaining entity products they are not eligible for, and users may submit digital originations for products that do not meet their needs based on various conditions.

Innovation Solution

A computing system with a graphical user interface that displays available entity objects and provides control inputs such as filters, sorters, display preferences, and rank inputs, allowing users to modify how these objects are displayed and interact with them based on eligibility criteria.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If users are presented with all entity products without filtering, then users can see all available products, but users may be discouraged by products they are not eligible for and waste time on unsuitable applications

Engineering Contradiction:

Improveefficiency of digital origination processVSAvoiduser experience in product selection

Core Design Contradiction:

ProductivityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-calculating and storing eligibility determinations for users against entity products before the user initiates an application. Eligibility data is prepared in advance and made available through the graphical interface, allowing users to see only products they qualify for, thus avoiding discouragement and wasted application efforts.

Inventive Principle:

Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The graphical user interface acts as an intermediary between the user and the entity products. It receives user inputs, queries the backend system for eligibility information, and presents filtered results to the user. This intermediary layer protects users from directly encountering products they cannot obtain, while maintaining accurate eligibility assessment.

Inventive Principle:

Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Ease of operation

If users are shown only products they are eligible for, then users are not discouraged, but users may miss products they could qualify for with different conditions

Engineering Contradiction:

Improveuser encouragement and motivationVSAvoiduser ability to explore different product options

Core Design Contradiction:

Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The graphical user interface dynamically adjusts its behavior based on user actions. When users interact with control inputs to modify display parameters, the system adapts by showing different sets of entity objects. This dynamic response allows users to explore products under different conditions while maintaining the base filter of eligibility, thus balancing encouragement with adaptability.

Inventive Principle:

Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system allows users to change display parameters through control inputs (such as filtering criteria, sorting options, and display preferences). When users modify these parameters, the backend system recalculates eligibility based on the new parameters and updates the displayed entity objects accordingly. This enables users to explore different product options while maintaining accurate eligibility assessment.

Inventive Principle:

Principle #35Parameter changes

3Adaptability or versatility

If the graphical user interface provides extensive control inputs for modifying display, then users can customize their experience, but the interface complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:

Improveuser customization capabilityVSAvoidgraphical user interface complexity

Core Design Contradiction:

Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control inputs in the graphical user interface are designed to serve multiple functions simultaneously. For example, a single control input can filter entity objects based on multiple criteria (eligibility, product type, conditions) and also sort results. This multi-functionality reduces the number of separate controls needed, thereby reducing interface complexity while maintaining extensive customization capability.

Inventive Principle:

Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system merges the functionality of multiple control inputs into integrated display modification capabilities. Instead of separate controls for filtering, sorting, and displaying, the interface combines these functions into unified control mechanisms. The backend system processes multiple display parameters together and returns a consolidated set of entity objects that satisfy all specified conditions, reducing the perceived complexity for users.

Inventive Principle:

Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS20250173166A1Modifiable graphical user interface

Publication Date: 2025.05.29 TRUIST BANK

AI summary

Systems and methods display a graphical user interface depicting a plurality of entity objects determined to be available to a user and a plurality of control inputs facilitating modification of how the plurality of entity objects are displayed, where the plurality of control inputs include an entity object filter, an entity object sorter, a display preferences option, and a rank input. A user input indicating how the plurality of entity objects are displayed is received via the graphical user interface, and display of the plurality of entity objects is modified in accordance with the user input.