Guide Rail Docking With Mechanical Blocking Against Tool Derailment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In automated assembly lines, inaccurate docking between docking and delivery guide rails due to flawed control programs can cause delivery tools to derail, posing safety risks.

Innovation Solution

A delivery apparatus with a blocking assembly that blocks the delivery tool on the delivery guide rail before docking, using a blocking member that switches between blocking and non-blocking positions, and a push member to facilitate reliable docking without electronic control.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Extent of automation

If a control system with drive motor is used to control docking between guide rails, then automation is improved, but positioning accuracy deteriorates due to control program flaws and motor failures

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomation of dockingVSAvoidpositioning accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the electronic control system (control program + drive motor) with a purely mechanical docking mechanism. The mechanical structure uses guide rails, docking members, and blocking members that physically guide and constrain the delivery tool, eliminating reliance on electronic control accuracy. This mechanical substitution ensures positioning accuracy through physical constraints rather than electronic control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a blocking member as an intermediary mechanical element between the delivery tool and the guide rail. This blocking member physically prevents the delivery tool from moving beyond the safe position, serving as a mechanical safety intermediary that compensates for the lack of precise electronic control. The blocking member acts as a fail-safe mechanical mediator that ensures accurate docking regardless of control system performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If electronic control system is used for docking, then productivity is improved, but safety deteriorates due to potential derailment from positioning errors

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedocking speedVSAvoidsafety against derailment
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements preliminary mechanical action by pre-positioning the blocking member in a location that prevents delivery tool derailment before docking occurs. The blocking member is mechanically positioned in advance to create a physical barrier, ensuring that even if electronic control fails, the delivery tool cannot move beyond the safe position. This preliminary mechanical preparation ensures safety independent of electronic control reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The blocking member serves as a mechanical cushioning element that prevents harmful effects (derailment) before they can occur. By having this mechanical safety barrier in place beforehand, the system compensates for potential electronic control failures, ensuring that positioning errors cannot lead to safety incidents. This mechanical cushioning provides inherent safety without reducing productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

3Reliability

If mechanical blocking assembly is added to prevent derailment, then safety is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety during dockingVSAvoidstructure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the blocking function with the existing guide rail structure. The blocking member is integrated into the guide rail assembly rather than being a separate independent system. This merging approach allows the safety function to be added while minimizing overall structural complexity, as the blocking mechanism shares structural elements with the existing guide rail and docking assembly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The blocking member serves multiple functions: it acts as a safety barrier to prevent derailment, a mechanical stop to define the docking position, and a guide element for the delivery tool. This multi-functionality reduces the need for additional separate components, thereby limiting the increase in device complexity while achieving improved safety through a single integrated element.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS12466013B2Delivery apparatus and automated assembly line
Publication Date: 2025.11.11 CONTEMPORARY AMPEREX TECHNOLOGY (HONG KONG) LIMITED
  • US12466013B2 patent drawing
  • US12466013B2 patent drawing
  • US12466013B2 patent drawing

AI summary

This application relates to a delivery apparatus and an automated assembly line. The delivery apparatus may include: a delivery assembly including a delivery guide rail and a delivery tool, where the delivery tool may be slidably disposed on the delivery guide rail; a docking assembly including a docking drive structure and a docking guide rail, where the docking drive structure may be configured to drive the docking guide rail to move relative to the delivery guide rail so that the docking guide rail is able to dock with the delivery guide rail; and a blocking assembly configured to block the delivery tool on the delivery guide rail before the docking guide rail docks with the delivery guide rail for receiving the delivery tool.