Guide Robot Dispatch Control for Unattended Visitor Assistance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Visitors often experience long wait times in facilities without adequate staff presence, leading to unserved needs and increased stress, as existing robot control systems lack efficient mechanisms to dispatch guide robots to assist visitors without staff nearby.

Innovation Solution

A control device and method that identifies the positions of facility staff and visitors using imaging units, instructing a self-propelling guide robot to move into the vicinity of visitors unattended by staff, enabling timely assistance and communication.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If guide robots are deployed to assist visitors, then service quality improves, but device complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveservice qualityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The guide robot is designed to perform multiple functions: it can identify visitors through imaging units, determine staff presence, navigate autonomously to target locations, and provide guidance services. This multi-functionality allows a single robot to replace multiple specialized devices, improving service quality while controlling system complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The robot autonomously identifies visitors who need assistance, determines whether staff are present, navigates to the appropriate locations, and provides services without continuous human intervention. The self-propelling capability and automated decision-making reduce the need for manual operation, improving service reliability while minimizing the complexity of control systems

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Productivity

If more staff are deployed to serve visitors, then service coverage improves, but operational cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveservice coverageVSAvoidstaff quantity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces human staff with an automated guide robot equipped with imaging units and navigation systems. The robot can continuously monitor facility conditions, identify visitors needing assistance, and provide services without breaks or additional costs, thereby improving service coverage while reducing the quantity of staff required

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the operational parameters from human-based service delivery to autonomous robot-based service. The robot operates with different efficiency parameters - continuous availability, faster response times, and the ability to serve multiple visitors sequentially - thereby achieving greater service coverage with fewer resources

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Loss of time

If guide robots autonomously navigate to visitors, then response time improves, but control complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevisitor wait timeVSAvoidcontrol complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The robot continuously scans the facility environment using imaging units to identify visitors and assess staff presence in advance. By maintaining situational awareness and pre-calculating navigation routes, the robot can respond immediately when assistance is needed, reducing visitor wait time while managing control complexity through proactive monitoring

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses imaging units to continuously feedback information about visitor positions and staff locations. This real-time feedback enables the robot to dynamically adjust its navigation and service delivery, achieving rapid response times while the feedback loop manages control complexity through automated decision-making based on current conditions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS11994875B2Control device, control method, and control system
Publication Date: 2024.05.28 HONDA MOTOR CO LTD
  • US11994875B2 patent drawing
  • US11994875B2 patent drawing
  • US11994875B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A control device that controls a robot capable of self-propelling is provided. The control device comprises: a facility staff member identifying unit configured to identify a position of a facility staff member in a facility; a visitor identifying unit configured to identify a position of a visitor in the facility; and a control unit configured to instruct the robot capable of self-propelling to move. In a case where the control unit determines that the facility staff member that has been identified by the facility staff member identifying unit is absent in a predetermined range near the visitor that has been identified by the visitor identifying unit, the control unit causes the robot to move into the predetermined range.