Geological Model Guide Surface Iterative Snapping

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current auto-tracking technologies for seismic data interpretation are time-consuming and do not effectively account for the quality of geological data, particularly struggling to capture dome-shaped horizons and increasing uncertainty when working away from the seed point.

Innovation Solution

An iterative snapping method using control points to define a guide surface, with a search window to find matching data points, and an algorithm to refine the guide surface based on differences, allowing for more efficient and accurate capture of geological features like dome shapes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Extent of automation

If traditional auto-tracking technology is used to interpret seismic data, then the interpretation process can be automated, but it becomes time-consuming and does not account for data quality

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomation of interpretation processVSAvoidtime-consuming processing
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by evaluating data quality locally at each trace position rather than uniformly across all data. The system calculates a quality metric for each trace and uses this to dynamically adjust processing parameters, allowing high-quality regions to be processed more aggressively while low-quality regions receive more conservative handling or are excluded from certain operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes parameters based on data quality assessment. The system modifies processing parameters such as search window size, iteration count, and similarity thresholds dynamically according to the quality metric of the underlying data, enabling adaptive processing that optimizes both speed and accuracy for different data regions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If traditional auto-tracking searches adjacent traces sequentially, then it can follow geological features, but uncertainty increases with distance from the seed point and dome-shaped horizons cannot be captured

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of feature trackingVSAvoidability to capture complex shapes
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transitions from sequential 1D trace-by-trace processing to a 2D surface-based approach. By defining a search surface that extends laterally across multiple traces simultaneously, the system can capture dome-shaped and other complex 3D geological features that sequential methods miss. This dimensional expansion allows the algorithm to follow geological features in both lateral and depth directions concurrently.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements dynamic adaptation by iteratively refining the search surface based on previously found features. The search surface expands and adjusts its shape in subsequent iterations, allowing the system to adapt to the actual geometry of geological features like domes. This dynamic approach enables the algorithm to maintain reliability while capturing complex shapes that static sequential methods cannot handle.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Measurement precision

If a large search window is used to find matching data points, then more potential matches are considered, but processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of matching data pointsVSAvoidprocessing speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by adjusting the search window size based on the quality metric of the underlying data. In high-quality data regions, larger search windows can be used to ensure accurate matching without significantly impacting overall processing time. In low-quality regions, smaller search windows are used to maintain processing efficiency, as the data quality constraints already limit the reliability of extensive searching.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent dynamically changes search parameters including window size based on data quality assessment. The system calculates optimal search parameters for each region based on the quality metric, allowing larger windows where data quality justifies the additional processing and smaller windows where efficiency is prioritized. This parameter adaptation resolves the contradiction between matching accuracy and processing speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS11762114B2Method for constructing a geological model
Publication Date: 2023.09.19 ROXAR SOFTWARE SOLUTIONS
  • US11762114B2 patent drawing
  • US11762114B2 patent drawing
  • US11762114B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention relates to a method of providing a geologic model representing geologic features based on geologic measurement dataset constituted by a number of data points sampled in a chosen region. The method includes the following steps: a) receiving at least one user selected control point (1) representing a geological feature in the measurement data set, b) providing an initial guide surface (2) with a predetermined shape, the control point (1) being positioned in said initial guide surface, c) comparing said initial guide surface shape with the sampled data points (4) for detecting measurement data points being similar to the measurement data of said control point (1), providing a vertical difference value representing the vertical difference between the depth of the guide surface and the depth of said corresponding data points for each compared data point in said set, d) from a selected set of said difference values, generating a new guide surface (5) corresponding to the control and data points.