Guided Air-Drop Package Control for Precise Soft Landing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional air drop systems face challenges in delivering goods accurately in adverse weather conditions and urban areas due to lack of guidance and control, fragility of equipment, entanglement issues, and the need for multiple parachute sizes, leading to high costs and complexity.

Innovation Solution

A guided direct air-shipping package system with a flight controller that uses aerodynamic properties to reduce forward airspeed, incorporates fins or wings for flight path control, and employs GPS and sensors for precise navigation, along with a transceiver for real-time monitoring and manual override, and a crushable nose section for soft landings.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If parachute structures are used for air drop delivery, then soft landing capability is improved, but guidance accuracy and control in adverse weather conditions deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesoft landing capabilityVSAvoidguidance accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system divides the delivery function into two separate components: a parachute for soft landing and a powered vehicle for precise navigation. The powered vehicle maintains control and accuracy during flight, while the parachute deploys only at the final stage to provide gentle landing, thus resolving the contradiction between soft landing capability and guidance accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system merges a powered vehicle with a parachute system, combining the navigation capabilities of an engine-controlled platform with the soft landing benefits of parachute deployment. This hybrid approach allows accurate delivery in adverse weather while maintaining gentle cargo landing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Strength

If large surface area parachutes are used, then soft landing capability is improved, but entanglement in ground obstructions increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesoft landing capabilityVSAvoidentanglement risk
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system separates the landing function from the descent function. The powered vehicle handles the descent and positioning, allowing for a much smaller parachute to be used solely for final cushioning. This segmentation reduces the parachute surface area dramatically, minimizing entanglement risk while preserving soft landing capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses a small, simple parachute that is deployed only for the final landing phase rather than a large parachute for the entire descent. This disposable-like approach to the parachute (sacrificing it for a brief final function) reduces complexity and entanglement risk while achieving the soft landing goal.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

3Adaptability or versatility

If multiple parachute sizes are used to cover broad payload range, then adaptability is improved, but device complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepayload capacity rangeVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The powered vehicle serves multiple functions: it provides propulsion, navigation, and payload adjustment capabilities. By using a single versatile powered platform that can carry different payload configurations, the system eliminates the need for multiple specialized parachute systems, reducing complexity while maintaining adaptability across a broad payload range.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses a dynamic powered vehicle that can adjust its performance characteristics (speed, altitude, trajectory) based on payload requirements, replacing the static approach of selecting from fixed parachute sizes. This dynamic adaptability allows a single system design to handle varying payload capacities without increasing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Ease of manufacture

If conventional air drop systems are used, then delivery cost is reduced, but delivery accuracy in congested locations deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedelivery costVSAvoiddelivery accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The powered vehicle is equipped with autonomous navigation capabilities including GPS receivers and onboard processors that enable it to self-guide to the precise delivery location without requiring complex external control systems. This self-service navigation maintains cost-effectiveness while dramatically improving delivery accuracy in congested areas.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates GPS receivers and onboard computers that provide continuous feedback on the vehicle's position and trajectory, allowing real-time course corrections to ensure precise delivery to the target location. This feedback mechanism improves accuracy without proportionally increasing system cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables accurate and safe air-to-ground shipments in various settings, including urban areas and extreme weather, with reduced landing site requirements and lower costs, while accommodating fragile cargo and minimizing errors.

Implementation Method 1

The aerodynamic shape is designed to be high drag relative to traditional flight vehicles such that forward velocity and terminal velocity are reduced

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAerodynamic drag: Drag

Implementation Method 2

The aerodynamic shape is designed to be high drag relative to traditional flight vehicles such that forward velocity and terminal velocity are reduced

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAerodynamic lift: Aerofoil

Implementation Method 3

The nose of the package may be constructed of material configured into an energy absorbing crushable impact zone

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectImpact force absorption: Impact Force

Data Source

PatentUS12154065B2System and method for performing precision guided air to ground package delivery
Publication Date: 2024.11.26 AEROVIRONMENT INC
  • US12154065B2 patent drawing
  • US12154065B2 patent drawing
  • US12154065B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Described is a method of delivery for cargo or goods from an aerial vehicle (mothership) to a designated ground delivery location via the use of a direct air shipping package. For example, an aerial vehicle may be an airplane or helicopter that remains at altitude with a package stowed for deployment. As the mothership travels in the vicinity of the designated location the package flight control computer (flight controller) calculates a preferred travel trajectory based upon the aerodynamic properties of the package and location relative to the designated delivery location such as a small delivery pad located on a patio of a home. When the mothership transits through a calculated release point the package disengages the mothership. As the package descends it may increase accuracy relative to the designated delivery location by altering aerodynamic properties to maintain the preferred travel trajectory and decreasing landing zone size requirements and increasing precision of delivery. To reduce the impact force at landing the designated delivery location and/or the package may contain a net, airbag, parachute or similar device to provide a suitably soft landing suitable for commercial home delivery.