Guided Home Security Inspection With Event-Triggered Body Cameras

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing vacation checks by law enforcement agencies are inefficient, requiring manual intervention and excessive battery consumption of body cameras, and lack effective video monitoring to ensure thorough dwelling inspections.

Innovation Solution

An on-demand security inspection system that coordinates police visits using predefined checklists, real-time communication, and video recording, leveraging vehicle and body-worn sensors to optimize battery usage and minimize human intervention.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If body camera records continuously throughout the entire shift, then all events are captured, but battery consumption becomes excessive and data files become very large

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveevent capture completenessVSAvoidbattery consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The body camera system transitions from continuous recording to periodic recording based on event detection. The system records continuously only when events of interest are detected (such as suspicious activities, alarms, or emergencies), and remains in a low-power state otherwise. This periodic action maintains reliable event capture while dramatically reducing battery consumption and data storage requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses feedback from sensors and detectors to trigger recording operations. When sensors detect potential events or anomalies, the system receives feedback and activates recording accordingly. This feedback mechanism ensures that recording occurs only when necessary, balancing complete event capture with energy conservation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If body camera records continuously throughout the entire shift, then all events are captured, but data files become very large requiring extensive human review

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveevent capture completenessVSAvoiddata review time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

By implementing periodic recording based on event detection rather than continuous recording, the system maintains complete capture of relevant events while significantly reducing the volume of data that requires human review. This directly reduces the time investment needed for data analysis and review.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The feedback mechanism triggers recording only when events of interest are detected, ensuring that the data reviewed by humans contains only relevant information. This eliminates the need to scan through large amounts of irrelevant footage, dramatically reducing review time while maintaining event capture completeness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If officer manually checks each area and collects feedback, then thorough inspection is achieved, but time consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinspection thoroughnessVSAvoidfeedback collection time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The inspection system incorporates automated sensors, detectors, and electronic devices that perform inspection tasks independently without requiring manual intervention for each measurement. The system self-monitors conditions such as intruder detection, environmental parameters, and security status, providing automated feedback that reduces the time officers spend manually checking each area while maintaining thorough inspection reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces manual mechanical inspection processes with automated electronic sensing and detection systems. Sensors, cameras, and electronic detectors automatically monitor and report on inspection items, eliminating the need for officers to physically check each area and manually record findings, thereby reducing time consumption while maintaining inspection thoroughness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Use of energy by moving object

If body camera is turned on manually, then power consumption can be controlled, but operation becomes cumbersome requiring human intervention

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower consumption controlVSAvoidmanual operation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The body camera system automatically activates and deactivates based on detected events and predefined conditions without requiring manual intervention. The system self-manages its operational state, turning on when events occur and turning off during normal periods, thereby maintaining power consumption control while eliminating the cumbersome manual operation requirement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses feedback from sensors and detectors to automatically control camera operation. When events are detected or conditions change, the system receives feedback and adjusts its operational state accordingly, eliminating the need for manual switching while maintaining control over power consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS12367537B2Guided home security inspection policing service
Publication Date: 2025.07.22 FORD GLOBAL TECH LLC
  • US12367537B2 patent drawing
  • US12367537B2 patent drawing
  • US12367537B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An on-demand security inspection system is provided for dispatching an investigator to a target dwelling. The investigator (e.g., a police officer) carries a video camera (e.g., a body cam). The inspection system comprises a service management server, a requestor interface, and an investigator interface. The requestor interface is configured to link a user to the service management server in order to specify a checklist. The investigator interface is configured to link a mobile unit (e.g., a vehicle control module or a handheld mobile unit) to the service management server in order to (1) communicate a plurality of checklist prompts to the mobile unit, and (2) return video data from the video camera captured according to the checklist prompts.