Information Processing for Guided LLM Summarization and Translation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing information processing systems struggle with varying writing styles in product descriptions, leading to inconsistent and suboptimal summarization and translation of transaction objects, which hinders user comparison and understanding.

Innovation Solution

An information processing system that utilizes large language model servers to obtain descriptions, apply guidelines for summarization and translation, and evaluate the results to ensure accuracy and consistency, using multiple models and stages to refine summaries and translations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If administrators elaborate expressions in descriptions to communicate product attractiveness, then the descriptiveness and appeal of products is improved, but the writing style consistency and summarization accuracy deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduct communication effectivenessVSAvoidsummarization accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the summarization process into multiple stages: first extracting key information points from the original description, then generating summaries that standardize the format while preserving the essential product attributes. This segmentation allows the system to handle diverse writing styles in the input while producing consistent, standardized outputs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies parameter changes by transforming the input descriptions through controlled modification of their structural parameters. The system changes the format, tone, and organization parameters of the descriptions to achieve standardization while maintaining the core product information and appeal conveyed by the administrators.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Device complexity

If the system processes only original texts without guidelines, then the processing simplicity is maintained, but the summary consistency and quality deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing simplicityVSAvoidsummary consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements preliminary action by pre-defining summary guidelines and templates before processing the actual descriptions. These guidelines establish the expected format, structure, and key information points that must be included in the summaries, enabling consistent processing without adding complexity to the core summarization mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms where the generated summaries are evaluated against the predefined guidelines and original descriptions. This feedback loop allows the system to adjust and refine its summarization process, ensuring consistency and quality while maintaining processing simplicity through automated validation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20250217862A1Information processing system, information processing method, and non-transitory computer readable medium storing program
Publication Date: 2025.07.03 RAKUTEN GROUP INC
  • US20250217862A1 patent drawing
  • US20250217862A1 patent drawing
  • US20250217862A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An information processing method causes one or multiple computers to obtain a description of a transaction object input by an administrator of the transaction object, obtain a guideline related to a summary of the description, and transmit the description and the guideline to a summarization model to obtain a summary of the description.